Home Blog Page 561

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: The Orchestrated Pogrom That Shook India

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: The Orchestrated Pogrom That Shook India

This day is marked by the ghastly violence unleashed against the Sikh community in the capital metro city and many parts of our country. It left behind a deep, unhealed wound in the minds of the victims’ families. Yes, it was on 1 November 1984 witnessed widespread attacks on members of the Sikh community across the country. While official records of the casualties were never adequately maintained or disclosed, different sources estimate that the death count surpassed 10,000 people.

According to official records, 2,733 Sikhs were killed in cold blood in Delhi alone, though human rights organizations place the number nearer to 4,000. The numbers in the rest of Bharat continue to defy documentation. This apart, many Gurdwaras (Sikh Temples) were damaged; properties, shops, and other businesses run by the Sikhs were subjected to arson and plundering. Lumpen elements ‘showed off their bravery’ in molesting the women.

Why This Tragedy?

To know the reason, we must go back to 1977-80. That was when the Janata Party government headed by Morarji Desai was in power. In 1979, Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale started gaining control Khalistani Movement. His influence grew daily, and he occupied Har Mandir Saheb, known as the Golden Temple, the most sacred place of worship for the Sikh community.

In 1979, Morarji’s government fell, and Charan Singh led a caretaker government for six months. In 1980, Indira Gandhi returned to power. The years 1980-83 witnessed several tragic incidents of terrorist acts in Punjab and Delhi. Initially, the weak-kneed approach of the Punjab State and Central governments made Bhindranwale a law unto himself. Finally, the Central government courageously sent the Armed Forces to Har Mandir Sahib.

This Operation Blue Star, despite the utmost restraint by our Army, managed to finish Bhindranwale and his men once and for all. However, many parts of the Golden Temple suffered colossal damage. The Central Government assured us that the repair and refurbishment would be completed immediately. However, the Sikh community felt hurt and alienated.

A section of Khalistanis was still active, and they schemed to assassinate the Prime Minister and the Army Officials who carried out Operation Blue Star. They made several unsuccessful attempts on the life of the PM, and finally, on 31 October 1984, the then Prime Minister of India, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, met a tragic end when her security personnel turned against her at her official residence in New Delhi. Two of her bodyguards, Satwant Singh and Beant Singh, both members of India’s Sikh community, carried out the assassination. The incident occurred as she walked through the garden of her home on Safdarjung Road.

Hell Broke Out

As said in the beginning, after the assassination, as the nation was struggling to come to terms with the unfortunate tragedy, a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions started building up.

The violence was carried out with shocking brutality, as attackers used crude weapons, including knives and clubs. Many victims faced horrific deaths through savage beatings, while others were set ablaze and burned to death. One particularly cruel method of torture involved using burning automobile tyres to inflict a slow and agonizing death on Sikh victims. This method became symbolic of the shocking inhumanity displayed during the violence.

The madness continued for several days as the law-enforcing machinery refused to intervene. Holding onto the voter list and ration card details, a group of men carried out attacks on the Sikh population, locality by locality, in a targeted manner.

Several neighbourhoods in Delhi bore the brunt of the violence, particularly the areas of Shahadara, Trilokpuri, Mongolpuri, Nand Nagri, Sultanpuri, and Geeta Colony. Reports indicate that approximately 20,000 people were forced to flee the capital city, while more than a thousand were left homeless. The violence spread beyond Delhi, with Sikh communities facing attacks across multiple northern states, including Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh.

Was It Spontaneous?

There have been efforts to portray the violence as a spontaneous outburst by people grieving their prime minister’s death. However, closer examination reveals evidence of a carefully crafted and organized plan aimed at “teaching the Sikhs a lesson.”

Former union ministers Kamal Nath and HKL Bhagat, Congress leaders Jagdish Tytler, and Congress lawmakers Sajjan Kumar, Lalit Makan, and Dharam Das Shastri were some of the key accused in riot cases for instigating mobs. As reported by Sudip Mazumdar, a Journalist (eyewitness) who deposed in the Nanavathy Commission subsequently said that Jagdish Tytler was found dictating to the Delhi Police Commissioner. The same was the case with other Congress MPs and leaders of Delhi.

Epilogue

It is unfortunate that as a nation, we have failed to render justice to the affected families. To rub salt in the wounds, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, on 19 November 1984, in his speech, said, “Some riots took place in the country following the murder of Indiraji. We know the people were outraged, and for a few days, it seemed India had been shaken. But when a mighty tree falls, it is only natural that the earth around it does shake a little.”

The riots and the orchestrated pogrom against the Sikh community left a deep divide between the Hindus and Sikhs. The riots were held up as excuses to revive, and the violence ruled Punjab for over two decades, though Bhindranwale was removed from the scene in mid-1984, the Khalistani movement was revived citing the Riots. Unfortunately, the justice has not been meted out to the Sikh Community.

Keeping politics away, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh focuses on bringing both communities together in the nation’s interests.

Jambunaathan is a journalist and content writer who specializes in national and social development stories and, as part of a national magazine’s editorial team and mentors young writers.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Not Just Kashmir, TN’s 60-Year Brahmin Hate Is Genocide Too’, Actress Kasthuri Shankar Calls Out Hate Against Brahmins By Dravidianists

Actress Kasthuri Shankar has blasted the ruling DMK government in Tamil Nadu for promoting a divisive ideology that incites hate and abuse against Hindus, particularly targeting the Brahmin community through name-calling and ridicule. Her fierce speech took place during a recent protest rally organized by Indu Makkal Katchi (IMK) Chief Arjun Sampath. The rally called for the creation of legislation to safeguard the Brahmin community, akin to the Protection of Civil Rights (PCR) Act that exists for Scheduled Caste communities. This event on 3 November 2024, at Rajarathinam Stadium in Egmore, Chennai, was a response to the rising hate speech and hostility directed at Brahmins in the state by Dravidianist and other anti-Hindu elements.

Kasthuri began her speech by thanking IMK Chief Arjun Sampath for organizing the protest to protect and support the Brahmin community, as well as expressing gratitude to the members of other communities who attended to show their solidarity. She then shared her experiences in her profession, revealing that despite being a well-known actress and a skilled orator, she has been repeatedly excluded from TV debates and discussions. She alleged that television networks deny her participation due to pressure from above, highlighting the systemic obstacles she faces.

Kasthuri then criticized the Dravidianist agenda in films, pointing out how they fail to overcome existing lobbies. She referenced a scene from the movie “Pariyerum Perumal”, acknowledging it as a good film but criticizing a particular moment where a man sits with his shirt open in a bar, in order to specifically show that he is a Brahmin by focusing on the sacred thread (janeu). She argued that this was a deliberate attempt to ridicule Brahmins, as she noted there were no similar depictions of religious symbols from other communities, such as a man wearing a Taqiyah (Muslim skullcap) or a Christian depicted with a cross. She emphasized that this scene served no relevance to the film’s narrative and was merely intended to mock the Brahmin community.

Actress Kasthuri said, “There is a bar scene in “Pariyerum Perumal” where the hero, a young man from the Scheduled Caste, goes to drink in an attempt to resolve his depression for once. In that scene, everyone is drinking, but only one person is shown without a shirt. Why is that? It’s to highlight the sacred thread (janeu). As I watched, I looked around the bar, if anyone else was depicted wearing a skullcap, a cross, or any other community symbols. But there was no one. Not even someone with a big moustache. Yet, they chose to establish him shirtless in that particular scene because they could not speak of brahmin hate anywhere.”

She also criticized the hypocrisy of these films, citing another example to take a jab at the lobbyists. She referenced “Soorarai Pottru“, where the hero, who in real life is from the Brahmin community, is portrayed under the name Maaran, suggesting a different community. In contrast, the villain is depicted as coming from the Brahmin community, highlighting the skewed representation and agendas at play in these narratives.

Kasthuri then asserted that the genocide in Kashmir is not a standalone incident; she argued that the ongoing hate against the Brahmin community in Tamil Nadu for the past 60 years is also a form of genocide. She emphasized that this sustained hostility is eroding their sense of belonging and identity, constituting a gradual destruction of their community.

Kasthuri then attacked the Dravidianists agenda by stating, “Denial of existence of God (Atheism) is the fundamental principle for Dravidianists, for that they have taken stand animosity toward Brahmins. It is because, if they say there is no god who will believe when there is someone in the temple devoutly engaged in bhakti follows all rules and regulation, thus the Hindu community will be united right. It’s akin to the story of the four bulls: when four of them stand together, no one can harm the Hindu community.”

She continued by highlighting how Dravidianists plot against one another, pitting individuals against each other while oppressing others. They create false narratives that even some Iyers and Iyengars have bought into, thinking they will gain inclusivity. However, she warned that they are merely being used as pawns in a scheme to ridicule their community.

Then blasting the entire Dravidian ecosystem by stating, “They are ridiculing our community by name-calling, using variety of terms like Paapan, Noolibaan, and Ibrahim brother had said and went that they even refer them as Brahmin Adi Varudi and Sombu etc. At least for them, Adivarudi and Sombu, then think of my situation. Because I am an actress and a woman, they will directly go to only one thing and stop there. There is a certain word for it, but the words they use are not a worse cuss word than ‘Dravidiyas’. Even if they refer to me with that word, I will happily say that my work is better and I am putting in my own hard work, not like you who is divisive c*ck and unjust p*mp.” 

She also mocked Suba Veerapandian, General Secretary of Dravida Iyyakka Tamilar Peravai, for ridiculing Brahmins by questioning how many have died for a cause. In response, she suggested he watch today’s situation, highlighting the Pulwama incident and a recent movie portraying a Brahmin soldier who died for the nation. She pointed out that it would be equally valid to ask how many from your community have not profited from making movies about these tragedies

Kasthuri then asked, “Who is Aryan Vandheri (immigrants/settlers)? Tamils have been engaged in spiritual practices and worshiping deities in temples since the era of Sangam literature. Vanniyars and Devas are alongside Kshatriyas, while Chettiyars, Mudaliyars, and Velalars are recognized as Vaishyas. Similarly, Shivacharyas, Iyers, Iyengars, Saivapillais, and Pandarams who worked in temples are classified as Brahmins.”

Then she asked, “Who are you to claim that there is no Tamil identity? Three hundred years ago, those who came to serve the king and those who attended to the royal household spoke Telugu. Now, when you assert that Tamils are your people, who are you to say that Tamils are not Brahmins? That’s why no movement can be called Tamilar Munnetra Kazhagam; instead, they create the term ‘Dravidam.'”

She also emphasized that this is not about unity for Brahmins, but a unity for all Hindus.

Furthermore, she noted that while E.V. Ramasamy was playing Goli and peeling onions, many Brahmins were actively engaged in social reforms and the freedom struggle. She named several individuals, including Subramaniya Siva, Vanginathan, Bharathiyar, and Srinivasa Iyengar, as well as women like Colonel Lakshmi and Sister Subalakshmi.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TOI, The Hindu Secularize Chennai Couple Mohd Nishad, Nazia Murder Of Minor Dalit House Help On Deepavali Day

TOI, The Hindu Secularize Chennai Couple Mohd Nishad, Nazia Murder Of Minor Dalit House Help On Deepavali Day.

The brutal killing of a 16-year-old Dalit domestic worker in Chennai has shocked the city and sparked widespread condemnation. Initial reports and police statements indicate that the young girl, employed by an Islamist businessman’s family in Aminjikarai, faced sustained abuse and torture, culminating in her tragic death. However, varying accounts of the incident have emerged in media coverage, with some publications omitting names and providing differing details of the crime.

The victim, a Dalit from Thanjavur, had been brought to Chennai to work as a domestic help for a Muslim businessman, 36-year-old Mohammed Nishad, and his wife, Nazia. The family, along with others alleged to have been complicit, now faces charges including murder and violations under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, as law enforcement authorities work to unravel the details behind this shocking case.

Alleged Motives And Confessions

According to a confession provided by Nazia, the victim was targeted after suspicions arose that her husband had developed a personal interest in the young Dalit girl. In her statement, Nazia admitted that jealousy and fear of her husband’s potential interest led her to begin abusing the girl, with accounts indicating that she subjected her to physical violence, including burning her body with an iron.

This abuse escalated over time, with Nazia allegedly involving her husband’s sister, Seema Begum, friends Lokesh and his wife, Jayashakti, and another maid, Maheshwari, in what has been described as a calculated campaign of abuse and dehumanization of the 16-year-old Dalit domestic help.

On 31 October 2024, during the Deepavali celebrations, the situation reportedly took a horrifying turn when the group accused the girl of stealing, verbally and physically assaulting her in response. Witnesses in the household claimed that the girl collapsed after being kicked by Lokesh, after which she was left unattended in the bathroom, unconscious. Upon realizing that she was unresponsive, the family locked up the residence and fled, without notifying anyone about her death.

A Grim Scene Uncovered

The Dalit girl’s body was discovered on 1 November 2024 when the owner of the apartment complex, Sarfuddin, alerted the police after noticing a foul odor and a locked, unattended apartment. The police broke into the unit to find the girl’s body lying in the bathroom. Initial investigations by the Aminjikarai police confirmed visible signs of torture, including burn marks and signs of strangulation.

Authorities quickly searched for the suspects, who had gone into hiding. They were ultimately apprehended from a friend’s Coimbatore residence, where they sought refuge after the incident.

Times Of India, The Hindu’s Secular Approach

Mainstream media such as The Times of India and The Hindu took a more secularist approach, omitting the names of the accused and focusing on the crime in their headlines.

While the article mentions details of the perpetrators in the paragraphs, it left this detail in the headline that grabs the most attention. This type of narrative setting is prevalent in reportage by leftist mouthpieces like The News Minute and The Wire, which ensure the secularisation of crimes is done to a tee. The Hindu & TOI have also joined the bandwagon of such secular mouthpieces.

Legal Implications Of Murder

In response to the case, the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW) condemned the alleged torture and killing of the young Dalit girl. The NFIW’s statement emphasized the need for a thorough investigation and called for strict punishment for those involved. The case is being prosecuted under the POCSO Act, a law that addresses crimes against children, though police have clarified that there was no evidence of sexual assault.

The girl’s mother, who reportedly lacked the financial resources to transport her daughter’s body back to her hometown, has received support from local authorities to conduct a cremation in Chennai.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

A Christian State To Divide North-East India? Mizoram CM’s US Speech Echoes Hasina’s Warnings

A Christian State To Divide North-East India? Mizoram CM's US Speech Echoes Hasina's Warnings

On 4 September 2024, Mizoram’s Chief Minister PU Lalduhoma delivered a “seemingly” powerful speech in Indianapolis, USA, advocating for the unity of the Chin-Kuki-Zo people—ethnic communities spread across India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh. His remarks called for these tribes to unite under a shared cultural and religious identity, transcending the national borders currently dividing them.

Lalduhoma’s message, urging “one leadership to achieve our destiny of nationhood,” emphasized their vision of a single homeland for the Chin-Kuki-Zo people, a notion that has raised concerns about a possible separatist movement with far-reaching implications for regional stability.

Lalduhoma’s address centered on the idea that these communities were “unjustly divided” across three countries and must come together to reclaim their “destiny of nationhood.” For many, his rhetoric went beyond a cultural message, suggesting a political unity that challenges existing boundaries in South Asia. His appeal to shared religious and ethnic bonds carries significant implications, particularly given the region’s history of ethnic tensions and separatist movements.

He said, “It’s just like a two-way traffic. As far as we are concerned, we shall never ever accept the division of our people into 3 countries. This will never be acceptable. The boundaries are imposed boundaries by the British government. In that committee, we are never represented, we are never consulted. Therefore, it is an imposed boundary and will never accept it. We will never accept construction of a border fencing between us.”

This vision for a unified Chin-Kuki-Zo nation has set off alarm bells among observers who worry it could encourage separatist sentiment and destabilize the region. Lalduhoma’s speech has raised questions about whether external powers might be supporting this movement, echoing recent statements by former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who warned of alleged foreign interference aiming to reshape South Asia’s geopolitical landscape.

Hasina’s comments, made just before her removal from office in a political coup on 5 August 2024, highlighted concerns about Western intentions to support the establishment of a Christian-majority state in the region. According to Hasina, a Western official had explicitly outlined plans to carve out an independent Christian nation from parts of Bangladesh, Myanmar, and India—a proposal Hasina compared to the East Timor model. Hasina suggested that this “Christian state” project could exploit the ethnic and religious divisions in South Asia, destabilizing the area to serve strategic interests.

Following Lalduhoma’s Indianapolis speech, Hasina’s statements have gained new relevance. The former Prime Minister had suggested that Western influence, potentially aligned with church groups in the United States, could be backing aspirations for a “Zo” homeland. This proposed homeland, commonly called “Zoram,” would cover areas of Bangladesh, Myanmar’s Chin State, and India’s Mizoram and Manipur states, where the Chin-Kuki-Zo people predominantly reside. The push for this unified state has reportedly garnered support from various church organizations in the U.S. and is being championed by the Zo Reunification Organization (ZRO) in Mizoram, which has political backing from local parties like the Zoram People’s Movement (ZPM) and the opposition Mizo National Front (MNF).

The Chin-Kuki-Zo tribes’ movement, which has been gaining momentum, is not without militarized factions. Groups such as the Chin National Army (CNA) in Myanmar, the Kuki National Front (KNF) in India, and other affiliated factions have been actively seeking autonomy, with violent actions occurring in their respective regions. Lalduhoma’s speech in the U.S. has fueled apprehensions that Western powers could be taking advantage of these separatist sentiments to push for broader geopolitical interests.

Hasina’s revelation about alleged foreign intentions to establish a Christian state underscores existing concerns about sovereignty and national integrity. Her statement that a U.S. official had sought permission for an American air base on Bangladesh’s St. Martin’s Island in exchange for Western support in her administration indicates deeper regional interests. Although she rejected the offer, Hasina’s warnings highlight the broader strategy that some analysts suggest underpins Lalduhoma’s call for a unified Chin-Kuki-Zo nation.

The Northeast region of India, where Mizoram and Manipur are located, has long been a hotspot of ethnic diversity and political fragility. Observers fear that Lalduhoma’s Indianapolis speech, with its appeal for a Christian-majority state, might resonate with existing ethnic militancy and lead to intensified demands for autonomy. Combined with Hasina’s claims of Western-backed agendas, this narrative points to a strategic interest that could have ramifications for India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh alike.

The coincidence of Lalduhoma’s call for unity among the Chin-Kuki-Zo people and Hasina’s warnings about Western ambitions to redraw borders are extremely concerning.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Gandhi Family’s Petty Politics: Silence On Bibek Debroy’s Death Reveals Deep-Rooted Grudges

Gandhi Family's Petty Politics: Silence On Bibek Debroy's Death Reveals Deep-Rooted Grudges

On 1 November 2024, Bibek Debroy—renowned economist, prolific author, and former Niti Aayog member—passed away, leaving a profound impact on India’s economic and intellectual circles. Yet, amidst the tributes from various political leaders and public intellectuals, a noticeable silence came from the Congress party’s leaders, including the leader of the opposition in Parliament, Rahul Gandhi, who neither issued a statement nor expressed public condolences. This silence has sparked debate, especially given Debroy’s own controversial history with Congress leadership over intellectual autonomy and freedom of expression. Was this the reason why the Gandhi family did not condole his death?

Debroy vs Sonia Gandhi

Debroy, an eminent economist, had a reputation for speaking truth to power. During his tenure as the director of the Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies (RGICS), as reported in India Today, he encountered political interference firsthand. Originally established as an independent think tank, RGICS was often viewed as an intellectual arm of the Congress party, with Sonia Gandhi serving as its chairperson. Debroy’s tenure was marked by attempts to make the institute self-financed and independent, a move that faced resistance from within. He argued that for RGICS to succeed as a credible, self-sustaining institution, it needed to shed its image as a Congress-aligned entity. This approach, however, often put him at odds with Congress leaders, who, according to Debroy, sought control over the institute’s intellectual direction.

In an interview with journalist Karan Thapar, Debroy recounted instances of political intervention, such as when he invited Dr. Seshadri Chari, the editor of the right-leaning Organiser newspaper, to a conference on Indian society, politics, and reform in 2002. Debroy stated that he faced pushback from those aligned with Sonia Gandhi, who advised him to rescind the invitation. He held firm, allowing Chari to participate, but recalled, There were people who spoke on behalf of Mrs. Gandhi and said,Please do not invite Seshadri Chari.I stuck to my guns.This incident underscored what Debroy saw as a culture of intellectual intolerance within Congress-aligned circles, and it would not be his last encounter with such pressures.

A more severe clash occurred in 2005 when Debroy and colleague Loveesh Bhandari published a report ranking Gujarat as the top state in India for economic freedom. At the time, Gujarat was led by then-Chief Minister Narendra Modi, a controversial figure for Congress. The report’s findings, published just before the Gujarat municipal elections, sparked significant backlash. Debroy recounted receiving a directive on official Congress stationery, signed by Sonia Gandhi herself, mandating that all future RGICS publications undergo political vetting. This was not acceptable to me, Debroy said. Shortly after, he resigned from RGICS.

Debroy’s criticisms extended beyond his personal experiences at RGICS. He highlighted a pattern of intellectual intolerance that, in his view, had persisted for decades in Indian academia. He cited several examples, such as economist Jagdish Bhagwati, who reportedly left the Delhi School of Economics under pressure due to his differing viewpoints, and Dr. Bellikoth Ragunath Shenoy, a member of the committee evaluating India’s Second Five-Year Plan who faced ostracization for opposing the economic policies favored by the then-government. According to Debroy, Dr. Shenoy was effectively blacklisted, unable to secure work in India, and eventually had to move to Sri Lanka.

Debroy’s Outspoken Nature

His outspoken nature also extended to defending others. In a notable instance, he criticized how the Ministry of Finance treated economist Jean Dreze after Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian invited him to the Delhi Economic Conclave, only to rescind the invitation abruptly while Dreze was en route to Delhi. Debroy publicly suggested that Subramanian apologize, highlighting a need for greater transparency and respect within government processes.

Debroy also spoke of a broader historical context for intolerance, stating that it was not a recent issue but an ingrained problem in Indian society. Intolerance has always existed, and we would be foolish not to recognize it, he remarked in an interview with The Times of India. He pointed to academic examples, such as textbook restrictions that selectively highlight certain historical narratives over others, particularly those related to southern Indian dynasties versus the Mughal era. Debroy argued that an ideological monopoly in Indian intellectual discourse maintained through political networks had created a climate where dissenting voices were unwelcome.

India’s political and intellectual circles have long grappled with the delicate balance between state influence and intellectual independence, and Debroy’s passing underscores these issues. In recent years, a growing number of the Award-wapsi gang of scholars expressed concerns aboutideological hegemony“, including more than 100 Indian and international academics who signed statementscondemning rising intolerance“. Debroy’s views offer a counter-narrative, emphasizing that such intolerance is not new and has manifested across political regimes.

The absence of a condolence message from the top Congress leaders, barring the only message by senior leader Jairam Ramesh upon Debroy’s death, has prompted questions about whether unresolved ideological divides are behind their silence.

For many, this episode reflects deeper concerns about how political influence shapes responses to intellectual figures in India and whether ideological conflicts limit acknowledging an individual’s contributions based on political alignments.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

PM Narendra Modi Lauds India’s Progress In Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence: Aiming For A TB-Free Nation By 2025

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 3 November 2024, highlighted the nation’s achievements in reducing tuberculosis (TB) incidence. In a significant acknowledgment of India’s efforts to eradicate TB, the Prime Minister said that the decline in TB incidence is an “outcome of India’s dedicated and innovative efforts“.

“Commendable progress! The decline in TB incidence is an outcome of India’s dedicated and innovative efforts. Through a collective spirit, we will keep working towards a TB-free India,” PM Modi posted on X.

The Prime Minister responded to a post by Union Health Minister J.P. Nadda, who acknowledged the World Health Organisation (WHO) ‘s recognition of India’s remarkable progress in reducing tuberculosis by 17.7 per cent from 2015 to 2023.

We remain steadfast in our commitment to creating a TB-free India. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recognised India’s remarkable progress, with a 17.7 per cent decline in TB incidence from 2015 to 2023 — a rate more than double the global decline of 8.3 per cent. This acknowledgment reflects India’s transformative approach to TB care and control,” Health Minister Nadda had posted.

Under the visionary leadership of PM Modi, “our government has expanded and strengthened the National TB Elimination Programme by taking key initiatives such as the Ni-Kshay Poshan Yojana to provide essential nutritional support to TB patients, and introduction of the BPALM regimen, a novel treatment for Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis”, the Health Minister had posted on X. J.P. Nadda also acknowledged the tireless efforts of the Ministry of Health Affairs’ “dedicated healthcare workers, whose unwavering commitment and hard work play a crucial role in this fight against tuberculosis”.

According to the WHO, India has one of the highest levels of treatment coverage for tuberculosis among the 30 high TB-burden countries. India also achieved a significant increase in the number of people receiving preventative therapy for household contacts of TB patients and people living with HIV, a WHO report showed. According to the report, 12.2 lakh people in India were put on preventive therapy in 2023, up from 10.2 lakh in 2022, and 4.2 lakh in 2021. India aims to end TB by 2025, five years ahead of the global target.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

PM Vishwakarma Yojana Transforms Pottery Makers’ Lives In Garhwa, Jharkhand

PM Vishwakarma Yojana Transforms Pottery Makers' Lives In Garhwa, Jharkhand.

Garhwa region of Jharkhand has witnessed a transformational change in lives of pottery makers over past few years, courtesy PM Vishwakarma Yojana. Many local artisans and craftsmen have taken the monetary assistance, under the key scheme, to either start new businesses or firm up existing enterprises. The scheme, designed to uplift small artisans, has become a turning point, bringing about a marked improvement in the lives of underprivileged workers.

In Tenar, a village near Garhwa, known for its pottery makers from the Kumhar community, local artisans shared with IANS on how the scheme impacted their lives, only for the better. Jhagadu Prajapati, a potter, remarked, “Our work became profitable after Modi government came into power. Our income has increased. Earlier, we only had work for three months and faced financial crises the rest of the year. But during the pandemic, PM Modi encouraged people to use clay over plastic and Chinese products, boosting our business.

Another artisan, Anil Prajapati, echoed similar sentiments: “There has been a visible change since PM Modi took office. Previously, our clay utensils lacked demand, and we often faced losses. Now, we’re able to sell nearly all our products.”

Women artisans also praised the path-breaking scheme. Reena Devi remarked, “Earlier, there was neither demand nor profit. But after PM Modi’s support and promotion, we see good rates and demand. Every woman can now make clay items on the potter’s wheel, a far less labour-intensive method.

Another artisan, Sohri Devi, praised the government’s efforts, saying they improved their standard of living and boosted their small businesses.

The Pradhan Mantri Vishwakarma Yojana, launched by PM Modi, is an ambitious initiative to empower artisans and craftsmen by offering loans at low interest rates. The scheme seeks to recognize and support these artisans as ‘Vishwakarma,’ helping them expand and modernize their craft. Through this, the government aims to uplift the lives and businesses of traditional artisans across the country.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

US Citizen Detained At Chennai Airport For Carrying Satellite Phone, Banned In India

US Citizen Detained At Chennai Airport For Carrying Satellite Phone, Banned In India

A United States (US) citizen was detained at Chennai International Airport on 3 November 2024. Airport officials told IANS that the US national was detained for carrying a satellite phone which is not allowed for personal use in India and is banned during travel through Indian airports.

As per rules set by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) and Union Home Ministry, satellite phones are banned in India for personal use. This is after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack in which the terror modules and handlers across the border had used satellite phones. Satellite phones are permitted only with specific permission from the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India.

The US national, David (55) was to travel to Singapore by an early morning flight. However, CISF personnel on security duty detected a satellite phone in his procession and hence he was detained at the airport. He was handed over to the Airport Police for questioning.

According to airport authority officials, the US citizen stated that he had flown down from the United States to New Delhi and then he flew to Andamans but was not questioned anywhere. However, the Airport Police confiscated his phone and he was detained as per the rules of the BCAS. The passenger does not have a No Objection certificate (NOC) issued by the department and phones are liable to be confiscated.

It may be recalled that after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, India has upped its security apparatus and has made several rules which include a ban on using satellite phones without prior permission.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Vijay’s TVK Is A Damp Squib On Arrival, Resolutions Have No Originality, It’s The Same ‘Aracha Maavu’ Of DMK That Has Already ‘Pulichified’

tvk dmk

A week after indirectly labeling the BJP as its ideological adversary and the DMK as its political rival, actor Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) released its official resolutions on 3 November 2024, once again reiterating critiques of both the DMK government in the state and the BJP-led Central government. However, the party’s statements is nothing but a photocopy of the DMK’s policies. It’s not even fit to be called as ‘old wine in a new bottle’ as wine improves in taste and increases in intrinsic value with age. However, Vijay’s TVK policies are nothing but the old stale batter that has been time and again ‘arachified’ by the DMK despite becoming ‘pulichified.

The term “Union government,” which was coined and popularized by the DMK to address the Central Government, has been echoed in TVK chief Vijay’s resolutions again and again which reaffirms that Joseph Vijay’s party is nothing but another DMK. It should not be surprising if Vijay follows a path similar to Kamal Haasan, who initially opposed the DMK but later pledged his party’s support along with his self-respect to secure a safe Rajya Sabha seat.

During the executive committee meeting in Panaiyur, which Vijay presided over, TVK accused the DMK government of neglecting public safety and catering to a privileged few. The party condemned the DMK for engaging in personal attacks against opposition leaders and critics, both online and offline.

Among the 26 resolutions passed at the meeting, one highlighted a rise in crime, including murder and robbery, as evidence of the ruling party’s failure to maintain law and order. Another resolution criticized the government for ignoring public welfare issues, such as the rampant sale of illegal liquor and escalating youth drug addiction, while prioritizing the interests of a select few.

The committee also denounced recent increases in electricity rates, milk prices, and property taxes, arguing that the government has not taken steps to enhance revenue. These are already being opposed by the AIADMK, BJP and the NTK.

Like DMK, the TVK has called for the abolition of NEET despite data proving that more number of underprivileged students have been cracking the medical entrance exam in the last few years. Students from the tribal community have secured a medical seat for the first time because of NEET. Vijay has now joined the bandwagon of DMK and Dravidianists in an attempt to confuse students which will only lead to more copycat suicides. If there are anymore suicides that happens over NEET, blood will not just be on DMK’s hands but also Vijay’s.

TVK’s resolutions emphasized that neither the Union government nor its representative, the Governor, should interfere in Tamil language matters and reiterated its stance for abolishing the Governor’s post. If Vijay had been a rational thinking person, he would’ve realized that calling for the abolishing of Governor’s post is unconstitutional. The Constitutional post has been put in place by Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar whom he claims to be one of the guiding ideologues for the party. But it’s too much to ask for from another Dravidianist.

He also criticized attempts to ‘saffronize Thiruvalluvar’ saying “First they saffronised Thiruvalluvar. Then they said Tamilazhagam is different, Tamil Nadu is different.“. Mr. Joseph Vijay, whether you accept or not, it is a fact that Thiruvalluvar was a Hindu sage who walked upon this earth before Christ himself. This attempt to secularize Thiruvalluvar proves that you’re just another Dravidianist itching to impose your faith on others.

Vijay also expressed strong opposition to the three-language policy when his own son Jason Sanjay studied in American International School, Chennai where a foreign like – French, Spanish, Korean is taught along with English. In some IB schools, students also have the option of choosing Hindi.

Furthermore, TVK has proved to be an anti-development party by calling for the cancelling of proposed greenfield airport at Parandur, citing concerns over agricultural land acquisition and increased flood risks in Chennai. This stance mirrors the DMK’s approach as an opposition party, which often opposes infrastructure projects. They also called for permanent employment for those affected by Neyveli Lignite Corporation projects and urged the conversion of contract jobs into permanent positions.

Like the DMK, TVK has also opposed the “one nation, one election” initiative, labeling it an anti-democratic move by the BJP-led Union government.

Like the DMK, TVK has proved to be an Islamist-appeasing party by calling for the withdrawal of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill when reports have emerged about entire villages and large swathes of land being claimed by the Waqf Board. If in case, the Waqf Board claims that Vijay’s Panaiyur residence sits on Waqf land, what will Vijay do?

On the other hand, Joseph Vijay wants Tamil to be the “language of worship”. Will he ask Muslims to do namaz in Tamil as well?

TVK urged the DMK government to accelerate a caste-based survey without blaming the Union government and recommended transferring education and health to state control, which is again a DMK rhetoric that’s never going to see the light of the day.

The most absurd and illogical resolution has been about calling Government of India and Government of Tamil Nadu to exert pressure on Sri Lanka to hold a referendum! Mr. Joseph Vijay, Sri Lanka is just rebuilding itself after an economic crisis and years after a bloody civil war. Sri Lankan Tamils want peace and don’t want you to fan flames with your virtue-signalling from Tamil Nadu.

If we’ve to summarize TVK in a meme, this would be it:

Instead of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), Vijay should change is party’s name to Dravida Vettri Kazhagam (DVK)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Joseph” Vijay’s TVK Passes Resolution Saying Tamil Should Be The “Language Of Worship”

"Joseph" Vijay's TVK Passes Resolution Saying Tamil Should Be The "Language Of Worship"

Actor-turned-politician C Joseph Vijay convened a meeting at the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) headquarters in Panaiyur, Chennai, where his party adopted 26 resolutions—many echoing DMK’s well-worn rhetoric. From advocating the scrapping of NEET to opposing the Governor’s role, One Nation One Election, and the Waqf Bill, Vijay’s resolutions underline TVK’s alignment with familiar DMK ideologies.

One resolution stands out: TVK’s call to establish Tamil as the “language of worship.” The resolution asserts that Tamil Nadu’s official language, Tamil, should be used in worship—a point that seems directed toward Hindu temple practices, where both Tamil and Sanskrit prayers coexist, blending traditions from Thevaram and Divyaprabandham to Vedic chants. However, Islamic worship in Tamil Nadu is almost exclusively conducted in Arabic, from the daily azaan to mosque prayers.

Given this discrepancy, a pressing question emerges: will Vijay’s call for Tamil worship extend to non-Hindu communities, or is this just another rhetorical nod aimed at reshaping Hindu traditions alone?

During the meeting, 26 resolutions were passed, several of which were nothing but the same ‘aracha maavu’ of the DMK, which has already been pulithified. From calling for scrapping NEET and abolishing the Governor’s post to opposing three language policies, One Nation One Election, and Waqf Bill, Vijay’s TVK has proved that he is nothing but another DMK.

One of the noteworthy resolutions passed by Joseph Vijay‘s “secular social justice” ideology-driven party is its call for having Tamil as the “language of worship”.

“Tamil is the official language in Tamil Nadu. It will be ensured that Tamil is made the language of worship.”, reads the resolution passed by Joseph Vijay’s TVK.

This resolution seems to be aimed specifically at Hindu temples as archakas and devotees offer worship predominantly in Sanskrit.

Joseph Vijay who seems to be aping the DMK, should know that Tamil worship is already prevalent in Hindu temples in Tamil Nadu. Saivite priests sing the Thevaram and other Thirumurais while the Vaishnavite priests sing the Naalayira Divyaprabandham. In many temples, the Tamil Vedas are chanted at the front of the procession, followed by the Sanskrit Vedas

However, it is but common knowledge that followers of Islam offer worship in Arabic. The azaan (call for prayer) that blares 5 times a day is recited in Arabic.

Hence it is pertinent to ask whether Vijay’s call for having Tamil as the “language of worship” will be made applicable to Muslims as well?

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.