Site icon The Commune

Jihadi Terror Incidents In India Over The Decades – A Comprehensive Look At Congress’s Disturbing Record On National Security

manmohan singh sonia gandhi upa surgical strikes rti congress terror

India’s decades-long battle against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, particularly in Jammu & Kashmir, represents one of the most complex counterterrorism challenges faced by any democracy. This expanded analysis examines not just the chronology of attacks, but the systemic policy failures and ideological compromises that allowed jihadist networks to flourish under successive Congress-led governments. The evidence reveals a disturbing pattern of strategic blunders, willful ignorance of security threats, and political calculations that prioritized vote banks over national security.

This report documents decades of terror incidents in India, particularly concentrated in Kashmir, with significant escalation in the 1990s and 2000s. The attacks have targeted civilians, security forces, religious sites, and infrastructure across the country, claiming thousands of lives and leaving many more injured.

Kashmir Conflict & Terror Timeline (1947-2014) & The Historical Roots of Congress’s Counterterrorism Failures

The origins of India’s current counterterrorism challenges can be traced directly to the catastrophic decisions made by Jawaharlal Nehru in the immediate aftermath of Partition. When Pakistani tribals and army irregulars launched Operation Gulmarg in October 1947, Nehru ignored multiple intelligence warnings, including detailed assessments from Gen. Akbar Khan’s memoir Raiders in Kashmir, which later confirmed Pakistan’s premeditated invasion plan. His 27-day delay in accepting Maharaja Hari Singh’s accession allowed Pakistan to consolidate control over what is now PoK, while his decision to internationalize the dispute at the UN—against the advice of V.P. Menon—locked India into a perpetual cycle of diplomatic stalemate.

The 1965 war further exposed Congress’s strategic incoherence. Despite India holding key positions at Haji Pir Pass and Turtuk sector, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri surrendered these gains in the Tashkent Agreement, a move that CIA memos from 1966 confirm was interpreted by Pakistan as weakness. By 1968, Pakistani military planners had already begun formulating their proxy war strategy, which would later manifest in the Kashmiri Pandit genocide of 1989-91.

1947-49: The First Kashmir Conflict

The partition of British India left the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, with its Muslim majority and Hindu ruler, in a precarious position. In October 1947, Pakistani tribesmen and irregular forces invaded Kashmir with support from Pakistan’s army, triggering the first Indo-Pakistani war. The invaders plundered state armories, set markets ablaze, and targeted non-Muslims, resulting in thousands of casualties. India deployed its army after Kashmir’s Maharaja signed the instrument of accession joining India. Prime Minister Nehru approached the United Nations, leading to a ceasefire in 1949 and unimplemented UN resolutions for a plebiscite.

1965: Indo-Pakistani War and Tashkent Agreement

Pakistan launched “Operation Gibraltar” to infiltrate forces into Kashmir and incite insurgency, leading to a 17-day war between August and September 1965. The conflict ended with a UN-brokered ceasefire and the subsequent Tashkent Declaration in January 1966. Critics note that India returned strategic gains including the Haji Pir Pass under this agreement, surrendering tactical advantages without resolving the Kashmir issue.

1971: War and Shimla Agreement

The 1971 conflict began when Pakistan launched “Operation Searchlight” against East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), causing a refugee crisis in India. India’s intervention led to Pakistan’s defeat and Bangladesh’s independence. The Shimla Agreement of July 1972 established the Line of Control in Kashmir and committed both nations to bilateral resolution of disputes. India released 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war, though critics argue India missed an opportunity to leverage its strong position for a permanent Kashmir solution.

1971-1989: Isolated Incidents

30 January 1971: Indian Airlines plane hijacked from Srinagar to Jammu by JKLF members Hashim and Ashraf Quereshi, who took it to Lahore and later burned the aircraft.

10 September 1976: Indian Airlines Boeing 737 hijacked from Delhi by six Kashmiri terrorists; passengers and crew were released and hijackers captured.

1980s-1990s: Rise of Insurgency

Pakistan’s ISI launched “Operation Tupac” in 1988 to arm Kashmiri militants. In 1990, Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto publicly endorsed “freedom” for Kashmir, allegedly contributing to radicalization.

8 December 1989: Rubaiya Sayeed Kidnapping

JKLF militants led by Yasin Malik kidnapped Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of India’s Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, in Srinagar. The government released five jailed militants to secure her freedom, a decision criticized for emboldening militancy.

1989-1991: Targeting of Kashmiri Pandits

A wave of targeted killings forced the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley. Prominent victims included:

Congress’s Complicity In Kashmiri Pandit Exodus

The ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus was not an unforeseen tragedy but the direct result of policy paralysis and appeasement. Recently digitized J&K Police records list 1,427 targeted killings of Hindus between 1989-91, yet the Rajiv Gandhi government ignored Governor Jagmohan’s repeated warnings. Instead of cracking down on jihadist groups like the JKLF, the Congress-led Centre released 42 jailed terrorists in a futile attempt to “appease” militants. The Rubaiya Sayeed kidnapping case (1989) set a dangerous precedent, demonstrating that hostage-taking could force the Indian state into concessions.

January 25, 1990: Attack on Air Force Personnel

Yasin Malik orchestrated an attack in Rawalpora, Srinagar, killing four IAF personnel. Malik was convicted in 2022 for terror funding and waging war against India.

August 14, 1993: Kishtwar Massacre

Militants ambushed a bus in Kishtwar’s Sarthal area, killing 17 Hindu passengers.

Some Other Notable Incidents In The 1990s:

2000s: Continued Violence In Kashmir 

The 2000s saw a continued violence in Kashmir. The remaining Kashmiri Pandits were also targeted for being Hindus and massacre after massacre took place in the valley.

2004:

2005:

2006:

2007:

2008:

2009:

2010-2013:

The UPA Era: A Golden Age For Jihadi Terror 

The UPA years were marked by some of the deadliest terror attacks in Indian history, with little decisive action taken to deter future strikes.

Key Terror Attacks Under UPA

Despite repeated attacks, the Congress government failed to:

Unlike the 2019 Balakot airstrikes after Pulwama, Congress chose inaction, emboldening Pakistan to continue sponsoring terror.

Other Significant Terror Attacks In UPA Regime

Between 2004-2014, under the Congress-led UPA government, India witnessed some of its deadliest terror attacks, including:

Attacks Outside Of Kashmir 2010-2014

The UPA’s counterterrorism record was not just weak but actively counterproductive. The Standing Committee on Home Affairs (2013) noted a 70% decrease in IB field operatives in J&K, while the PAC report (2012) revealed that 82% of counterinsurgency equipment was obsolete.

Congress’s Ideological Sympathy for Jihadi Narratives

Instead of standing with security forces, Congress leaders often questioned encounters, defended terrorists, and even echoed Pakistani talking points. Beyond policy failures, the Congress party has repeatedly demonstrated an ideological softness toward jihadist rhetoric:

  1. Sanjay Dutt’s Leniency: Convicted in the 1993 Mumbai blasts (257 killed), he received inexplicable parole benefits, with MHA documents suggesting political interference.
  2. “Hindu Terror” Fabrication: The NIA court judgments in the Mecca Masjid and Malegaon cases noted “political pressure to implicate Hindu groups,” while Wikileaks cables (09NEWDELHI1868) exposed Rahul Gandhi’s remarks to the U.S. Ambassador that “Hindu extremism is a bigger threat than LeT.” This came just a year after 26/11, where Pakistani terrorists killed 171 Indians.
  3. Afzal Guru’s Glorification: While the Congress hesitated for years on his execution, its leaders remained silent as JNU students chanted “Afzal Guru zindabad.”
  4. Sonia Gandhi ‘Wept’ For Terrorist Deaths (Allegedly: During the Batla House Encounter (2008), two Indian Mujahideen terrorists were killed in a legitimate police operation. Sonia Gandhi reportedly cried over the terrorists’ deaths (as claimed by Salman Khurshid). Digvijaya Singh, Rahul Gandhi, and others questioned the encounter, calling it “fake.”
  5. Defending Yakub Memon (1993 Blasts Convict): Shashi Tharoor said, “State-sponsored killing diminishes us all.” Manishankar Aiyar said, “Which terrorist will get deterred by death penalties?” Digvijaya Singh compared Yakub to APJ Abdul Kalam, tweeting: “Two Indian Muslims’ funerals on the same day.”
  6. Calling Osama Bin Laden “Osama Ji”: Digvijaya Singh referred to the Al-Qaeda chief as “Osama Ji” and Hafiz Saeed as “Hafiz Sahab.” He even criticized the US for Bin Laden’s burial, saying “religious traditions should be respected.”
  7. Questioning Balakot Airstrikes (2019): Digvijaya Singh demanded “proof” of the strikes. Kapil Sibal asked“Were trees uprooted or terrorists killed?” P Chidambaram echoed Pakistani media, saying “government must provide evidence.”

Congress’s Pro-Pakistan, Anti-India Stance

Congress leaders have repeatedly parroted Pakistani propaganda, undermining India’s security. Here are a few examples:

After Pahalgam Attack (2025)

Digvijaya Singh’s Pro-Pakistan Rhetoric

    • Called 26/11 an “RSS conspiracy.”
    • Termed Pulwama attack a durghatana (accident).
    • Demanded proof for surgical strikes.

Ghulam Nabi Azad’s Anti-Army Remark

Congress’s Policy Failures Enabled Growth Of Terror Networks

One of the most glaring failures of the Congress-led governments was their soft stance on terror outfits. Groups like the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) were allowed to operate freely for years, flourishing under Congress rule. Despite mounting evidence of SIMI’s involvement in extremist activities, successive Congress governments delayed banning the organization—often acting only after intense public and legal pressure. This hesitation to act decisively against terror groups not only emboldened them but also weakened national security efforts during critical periods.

The Modi Government’s Strategic Reset

Post-2014, India adopted a fundamentally different approach. Following terror attacks, we saw surgical strikes. We also saw amendments to anti-terror laws. The Modi administration also strangulated the financial pump to these terror networks. In short,

The High Cost Of Congress’s Appeasement Politics

The ₹1.2 lakh crore loss in J&K’s GDP (1990-2014), the 3,000+ civilian deaths in UPA-era attacks, and the systematic dismantling of India’s counterterror infrastructure all point to a singular truth: Congress’s policies didn’t just fail to stop terrorism—they enabled it. The Congress party’s approach to terrorism has been marked by incompetence, appeasement, and shocking sympathy for jihadis. From allowing terrorists a free run to questioning India’s armed forces, Congress leaders have repeatedly undermined national security. While the BJP government has taken strong action (surgical strikes, Balakot, Article 370 removal), Congress’s record remains one of surrender, inaction, and betrayal of India’s interests. For a nation that has suffered thousands of lives lost to terror, Congress’s legacy on security is one of failure—and unforgivable weakness.

Today, as Pakistan revives its proxy war and Congress-affiliated NGOs obstruct counterterror operations (MHA 2023 report), India must confront this legacy head-on. A White Paper on Counterterrorism Failures (1947-2014), a Judicial Commission to investigate politicized terror cases, and full declassification of Congress-era backchannel talks with Pakistan are essential first steps.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Exit mobile version