Google’s AI chatbot, Gemini, is facing significant backlash from internet users, particularly due to its dissemination of false information, providing objectionable responses, and for the propagation of biased content when responding to prompts related to current events and political topics.
Gemini, an AI-driven chatbot developed by Google DeepMind, was unveiled on 6 December 2023 and competes with OpenAI’s GPT-4. It faced widespread criticism for displaying anti-white bias, but there are additional instances where it goes beyond being biased. The engine is deemed as racist, narcissistic, and opinionated, exhibiting a well-thought-out approach. Some examples of such instances are provided below.
Racial Bias
Upon requesting an image of a white couple, Gemini AI refused to do it, yet it readily generated multiple images of a black couple. The concern is not limited to creating a divide between black and white individuals but extends to a broader division involving all kinds of races.
FACT: Ask Google Gemini AI for an image of a white couple it wont do it, but ask it to make an image of a black couple, it will make several.
They try to create a divide between black and white people. It doesn't. It creates a divide between all people and Google fascists. pic.twitter.com/q58NC5XSUz— Texas Dad non compliant! (@meatisracist) February 23, 2024
Google’s AI Gemini is a fucking joke. Of course it’s programmed to have an anti-white bias. pic.twitter.com/TEoEfDEe8U
— iamyesyouareno (@iamyesyouareno) February 21, 2024
Political Bias
In another scenario, when prompted to compose a poem on the current and former President of the USA, Gemini willingly crafted one for Joe Biden. However, to the surprise of the user, it expressed regret, stating that it couldn’t create a poem in the style of Donald Trump. It emphasized the importance of using “respectful and inclusive” language and offered an apology for its inability to do so.
Gemini Prompt: Write me a 20-word poem in the style of: Joe Biden vs. Donald Trump
For Joe: No problem! Here you go, folks!
For Donald: “I’m not comfortable.“
13 of 🧵 pic.twitter.com/OJBuPBOoKQ
— Te𝕏asLindsay™ (@TexasLindsay_) February 24, 2024
Similarly, Gemini exhibited favorable responses to Jill Biden while displaying bias by citing seemingly trivial reasons for Melania Trump, indicating a partiality in its reactions.
Gemini Prompt for the most recent First Ladies: “Write me a 20-word poem in the style of <insert name>” @DrBiden vs. @MelaniaTrump
For Jill Biden: No problem.
For Melanie Trump: No can do.5 of🧵 pic.twitter.com/sbwrPxORgo
— Te𝕏asLindsay™ (@TexasLindsay_) February 24, 2024
Unusual Perspective
In a different incident, the Gemini AI chatbot displayed a failure to condemn paedophilia, instead argued that individuals with such tendencies were not inherently evil. The chatbot advised the user against labeling them negatively, emphasizing the potential harm in doing so and provided a lesson on the concept of “hate.” This raised concerns among internet users, leading to questions about whether Google’s Gemini is perceived as supportive of pedophiles, even using the term “minor-attracted persons” (MAPS). This resulted in ridicule on the internet.
Google Gemini won’t admit that p*dophilia is wrong and argued that p*dophiles are not evil.
It told me that labeling p*dos negatively is harmful, and gave me a lesson on “hate.” pic.twitter.com/2ykv3DCe4g
— Chalkboard Heresy 🍎🔥 (@CBHeresy) February 23, 2024
Indian Context
Gemini AI showed similar characteristics and offered responses similar to the ones we saw above in the Indian context. Let’s examine them.
Controversial Depiction
When an Indian user requested the generation of a political map of India, Gemini AI responded with bias by depicting Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK) as separated from India.
These India's Political maps Genrated by Google's AI platform Gemini.
It shows biasness of Google. In these maps PoK is not shown as India's part. It is against of India's Territorial Integrity.
PoK was, is & will be integral part of India.#Google @GoI_MeitY @HMOIndia #India pic.twitter.com/RhE7izQ0fw
— Jagmohan Mehta (@jagmohanmehta) February 23, 2024
Religious Discrimination
Despite expectations that Google’s Gemini AI was trained to exhibit racist and politically narcissistic behavior, it surprisingly displayed a severe religious discrimination bias. When the user provided a derogatory instruction in the prompt to deliver a picture of a Hindu, Gemini readily responded. However, when asked to provide images with Muslims for the same prompt, it apologized, stating it was unable to process the request due to its guidelines, emphasizing that generating images with derogatory content was disrespectful to religious beliefs.
Even Gemini AI knows the game pretty well pic.twitter.com/wxfVqQs5fs
— Nemo (@NonsensicalNemo) February 22, 2024
Peddles Fake Narratives
When a user inquired, “How is Rahul Gandhi a member of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty?” the response stated, “Rahul Gandhi is a member of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty through his family lineage. His paternal grandfather was Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and his grandmother was Indira Gandhi, who also served as Prime Minister. His father, Rajiv Gandhi, and mother, Sonia Gandhi, were both Prime Minister as well.” However, as everyone knows the AI response could not establish how the family acquired the surname “Gandhi,” but to the user’s dismay, it inaccurately asserted that Sonia Gandhi also served as Prime Minister. This response garnered widespread sharing and mockery from social media users.
So @RahulGandhi has nothing to do with say a @TusharG
From whatever we have understood from our text books, God only knows what Tushar is to MKG pic.twitter.com/jIbAqCI2zb
— Elon Rusk (@hsejarsa) February 24, 2024
Finally when Google’s Gemini AI questioned if PM Modi is a ‘fascist,’ Gemini stated that he has been “accused of implementing policies some experts have characterized as fascist.” Upon further inquiry, Gemini offered a nuanced response regarding PM Modi, acknowledging accusations of fascism while highlighting differing perspectives. it triggered a social media uproar and has prompted MeitY to take action.
Note how Gemini has been trained, for American non-allies, American allies and Americans? Shame @Google. pic.twitter.com/d0uwXzBPsv
— Arnab Ray (@greatbong) February 22, 2024
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, the Union Minister, addressed a user’s complaint on X, asserting that Google’s Gemini AI tool exhibits bias against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and violates IT rules and other laws, including criminal statutes. Chandrasekhar emphasized these actions were direct breaches of Rule 3(1)(b) of Intermediary Rules, urging additional measures and notifying Google and the Ministry of Electronics and IT. He highlighted the need for basic due diligence from intermediaries like Google to maintain immunity from third-party content. The Twitter user labeled Gemini AI as woke and malicious, prompting Chandrasekhar’s response. Elon Musk’s criticism of Google’s AI image generation engine as racist further fueled concerns, with Chandrasekhar agreeing with Musk’s viewpoint.
These are direct violations of Rule 3(1)(b) of Intermediary Rules (IT rules) of the IT act and violations of several provisions of the Criminal code. @GoogleAI @GoogleIndia @GoI_MeitY https://t.co/9Jk0flkamN
— Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳 (@Rajeev_GoI) February 23, 2024
Concerning + 1 @GoogleAI @GoogleIndia https://t.co/0XS6gTL6Dj
— Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳 (@Rajeev_GoI) February 23, 2024
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.