Social media is outraged by videos displaying abusive and objectifying comments from Dravidian sex doctor Kantharaj. Although he portrays himself as a political analyst, his commentaries have been peddling hate against Brahmins and Hinds while attacking opposition parties like the BJP and AIADMK. His recent statements have crossed the Lakshmana Rekha, as he defends the sexual harassment faced by women in the film industry, claiming they willingly participated in the ‘casting couch’ and are now exaggerating claims.
Controversial journalist turned YouTuber Mukthar Ahmed, previously known for his role at Sathiyam News, introduced Dravidian ideologue Sex Doctor Kantharaj on his program as the brother of former Tamil Nadu Speaker Rajaram Mohan. Without any delay, the interview quickly turned towards inappropriate and double-entendre remarks.
Mukthar Ahmed started by asking, “Have you heard of ‘Adjustment’?” Dr. Kantharaj responded that he was indeed familiar with the term. Mukthar then asked if he had been approached for an adjustment, to which Kantharaj replied that it wasn’t necessary as the matter was settled by mutual consent; thus, no adjustment was needed. Mukthar countered, questioning whether this was not wrong, and Kantharaj suggested that Mukthar’s criticism stemmed from his lack of opportunity.
Dr. Kantharaj said, “It’s all part of life; is this an issue? It’s like the saying, ‘The stork that waits patiently at the sluice head leaves the small sprats alone and waits for the larger fish.’ We weren’t like that stork; we pursued the small sprats until the larger fish arrived.” When the anchor responded, noting that Dr. Kantharaj’s public statements would likely attract criticism from virtual commentators, Dr. Kantharaj drew parallels to the recent allegations made by actresses in the Tamil film industry about sexual harassment. He questioned whether he should withhold sharing his own experiences of physical enjoyment.
Dr Kantharaj ridiculed the allegations made by Tamil actresses with a lack of respect, stating, “They are claiming after 30 years that they have been ruined (sexually abused).” Mukthar added fuel to the discussion, saying, “Yes, look at that.” Dr. Kantharaj responded, “So, shall I not claim that 30 years ago, I also ruined some?” Mukthar interjected, “All are filled out.” Dr. Kantharaj replied, “Yes, all are expired.” Mukthar continued, “Now they are speaking up.” To which Dr Kantharaj retorted, “All these rusty goods are now sitting and claiming they have been abused. Is this even a topic? I find it laughable.”
Kantharaj then challenged the media, questioning why they had branded all the male actors as lustful animals and passed judgment on them for posting their pictures but had not shown the actresses who claimed in a similar light. Shamelessly, he remarked that the medical profession also has its own “adjustments,” comparable to those in the film industry, suggesting that the nature of adjustments in both fields is similar.
Dr. Kantharaj also mocked the film actresses who had voiced their experiences of sexual harassment. He claimed that their allegations of being asked to “adjust” were not instances of sexual harassment but rather reinterpreted the abuse in a more favourable light.
Shamelessly, Dr. Kantharaj made two statements that demeaned the victims who came forward. He said, “You share bed and get paid for it, only to don a chastity mask later. What’s fair in that?” He further suggested that actresses who now complain of sexual harassment are merely trying to regain their market value.
Targeting women in the film industry, he added, “She will act in films, become famous, and once her market value diminishes, she sits at home and claims she was sexually harassed.” Dr. Kantharaj continued to belittle the actresses, suggesting that if their names were not on the list of those who had been abused, they would feel less validated and claim that they, too, had been abused.
Throughout these comments, Mukthar Ahmed, the anchor, also equally provoked Kantharaj with his inflammatory remarks, expressing personal satisfaction as he shared his unfiltered views. One of his statements reduced women to mere objects of desire, “If you like a woman, only if you ask for it, you will get it, right,” He continued by suggesting that women should not question a man if he objectifies them or views them negatively, asking, “If it is wrong to ask means?” and He later added, “In such a vast cinema industry, only four have approached, while the others were virtuous.”
They both fabricated conspiracy theories, like erotic tales, suggesting that foreign shoots were also for “adjustments” and that hotel rooms used by them had hidden doors. Dr. Kantharaj claimed that actresses entering the film industry must comply with various “adjustments” related to the “casting couch.” It’s important to highlight that the term “casting couch” refers to the practice of soliciting sexual favours from job applicants in exchange for employment, particularly in the entertainment industry, specifically for acting roles.
They both implied to the audience that after actresses had performed glamorous roles and exposed their bodies, it was unjust for them to claim sexual harassment now. They questioned the fairness of this situation. Dr Kantharaj asked, “Why are you shooting a rain-drenching scene in a white dress? Only to show the body, right? In a bathing scene in the river, when she comes out of the river the body will be transparent.”
They also targeted actress Shakeela, pointing out that she had acted in adult films in the past and was now complaining about sexual harassment in the industry, which they deemed unfair. Additionally, they criticized MGR and Shivaji, with Dr. Kantharaj specifically targeting MGR. He claimed that MGR had included the most explicit content in his films, yet all the women voted for him and actresses performed glamorous roles in his movies, surpassing Shivaji’s fame in acting.
Dr Kantharaj claimed that men go to the cinema to satisfy themselves by watching the actresses on screen, whom they view as more attractive than their spouses. He argued that the difference between a sex worker and an actress is that while sex workers are considered inferior, actresses are seen as superior and are treated as leaders. Using the term “leader,” Mukthar targeted former Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa, demeaning her by referencing her glamorous roles.
At the end of the video, it became apparent that their previous statements had crossed the line. They then subtly recounted various Hindu myths and interpretations, attempting to simp backup from Periyarists and Dravidianists for their earlier derogatory remarks, which objectified women and indulged in satisfying themselves.
Then, Dr. Kantharaj presents Vishwamitra’s story, highlighting how, despite his rigorous penance, he fell in love with Menaka and fathered a child with her. This union is depicted in the world-famous painting by Raja Ravi Varma. Additionally, the story of Sabarimala Ayyappan is mentioned, with the claim that he was born from a homosexual union. The Tamil New Year, celebrated in April, is framed as a celebration of homosexuality, allegedly initiated by Vishnu and Naratha, who are said to have given birth to 60 babies.
Regarding Diwali, the tale of Satyabhama killing Narakasura is cited as its origin. Narakasura, according to this account, was the son of Satyabhama and Lord Krishna. However, since Satyabhama and Krishna had no children, the question arises, Who was Narakasura’s true father? Then peddled the narrative Dravidianist perspective, that the symbolism associated with Vinayakar (Ganesha) has roots in Buddhism.
One notable aspect common to both the host, Mukthar Ahmed, and the guest, Dr. Kantharaj, was their subtle criticism of actresses with opposing viewpoints. For instance, they specifically targets former chief ministers MGR and J. Jayalalitha from the AIADMK in this video, as well as actresses Kasthuri and Radhika Sarath Kumar, who support the BJP. In the video, actress Kasthuri wasn’t actually mentioned, but her glamorous image was later deliberately added to the YouTube banner to target and demean her.
Radhika Sarath Kumar was targeted in a different video on another YouTube channel, following her and her husband’s recent merger of their party with the BJP.
He also spread gossip about DMK loyalists, including actor Suriya’s wife, Jyothika. It seems that Dr. Kantharaj is more busy on spreading abusive gossip about women rather than political analysis.
On 13 September 2024, Actress Rohini Molleti has filed a criminal complaint with the City Police Commissioner’s office against Dr. Kantharaj, accusing him of making inappropriate and insulting remarks about actresses, suggesting that they had to “adjust” to obtain roles in the Tamil film industry during a recent YouTube interview.
Dr. Kantharaj’s comments, which appeared on the YouTube channel MyIndia 24×7, have sparked significant outrage on social media. In the interview hosted by controversial anchor Mukthar Ahmed, Kantharaj allegedly made vulgar statements suggesting that actresses in the Tamil film industry had to “adjust” to secure roles, which Rohini Molleti condemns as demoralizing to women in the industry.
In her complaint, Rohini has requested legal action against Dr. Kantharaj and the removal of the video from YouTube. She argues that his remarks, made in an interview about the casting couch issue in Kollywood, are offensive and unfounded. Rohini pointed out that Kantharaj disparaged living and deceased actresses, including Manju and Shakila, without providing any evidence. She accuses Kantharaj of using sensationalist tactics to gain social media attention while disparaging the entire film industry.
Meanwhile, social media users pointed out that if YouTuber Savukku Shankar was arrested for his provocative speech and YouTuber Felix Gerald was held accountable for facilitating his remarks, both involving demeaning comments about women police personnel, then similar action should be taken against the abusive Dr. Kantharaj and the false journalist Mukthar Ahmed for their obscene comments about women.
It is noteworthy that Mukthar Ahmed is a Dravidian ‘journalist’ with ties to the DMK’s top leadership.
In a 2022 interview, the same Kantharaj made genocidal comments on Tamil Brahmins. He had said, “You better go to your own country. Go there. Only you (Tamil Brahmins) were thrashed there by Chengiz Khan and Taimur. You came here whimpering.”
In another interview, Kantharaj discusses India’s 1983 World Cup win and, desperate to insert the Brahmin connection, erroneously states that Tendulkar is an Iyengar.
Subscribe to our Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.