News Tamil Nadu

“Bro-Sis Having Sex Not New, Mother-Son, Father-Daughter Having Sex Is Personal Matter If There Is Mutual Consent”: Periyarist And Dravidianist Writer Says, Clarifies After Outrage

June 28, 2024
The Commune

Dravidianists and so-called feminists who subscribe to the ideologies of EV Ramasamy Naicker (hailed as ‘Periyar’ by his followers) are known for advocating illicit extramarital affairs and have limitless sexual lives for women to break from the bondage of family and patriarchy.

Afterall, EVR himself had married Maniyammai, a woman way younger than him, whom he considered as his own daughter. EVR had also said that married women go to temples during festivals to get groped by other women. Dravidainists like Suba Veerapandian get dismayed at the term “adultery” and advocate for the usage of “relations outside of marriage”.

So, sexual perversion is not new to Dravidianists who follow the path of EVR.

However, in a new low, a Periyarist woman named Kotravai has seemingly called for normalizing incestual relationships and sexual relationships between mother-son, father-daughter, etc., if there is “mutual consent”.

In an interview to Avalglitz (a sub-channel of Indiaglitz), the Periyarist woman says “Today, people are talking about incest relationships. People are questioning why it is being opposed. Their question is reasonable. Is it right or wrong? With respect to sexual relationships, I will never come to a position of whether it is right or wrong. But, how do we handle this? As a society, what is the answer that we have to this question? Because, brother and sister having sex is not something new. If you look at Greek history, in the ancient times, relationships were based on a clan or a racial community. After a point of time, we’re changing the arrangements. The society is refining itself.”

She further goes on to say “The concept of chastity comes in relationships. It’s not a matter of whether it is right or wrong. Every sexual relationship, if it happens through mutual consent, nobody can call it wrong. Only when it is forced, it become a problem. So am I supporting sexual relations between father-daughter or mother-son? We can never go into that. It is their personal matter. Forcing oneself, raping, these are the problems for us. Beyond that whatever they discuss as “chastity” – whether he should be with her or she should be with him – it is not your problem. As long as they’re into it and they’ve given consent to each other, it is not our problem. If the society comes to this mindset, people can satisfy their needs with whomever they want. But if you keep suppressing it, it is getting exploded the other way.”

After the clip went viral, she took to her social media to clarify that all she meant was not to “moral police” people for their sexual choices or orientation and that her intention was not to normalize incestual or taboo relationship.

In the above video she says “Who are we to comment based on morality? I am strong in that position of mine. For that, I am not saying that those relationships or right and it is neither my job to promote such relations. I am person who approaches scientifically and respects human rights. Society has many approaches and we shouldn’t judge people. We’ve to approach to psychologically, scientifically, biologically and physiologically. That’s my argument. Only if you watch the full video, you’ll understand the context. The second part of the interview is yet to come. Only if you watch it till end, you’ll know what I am saying.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.