When reason fails, some people resort to the cheapest trick in Indian public discourse: blaming Brahmins. Actor Vinodhini Vaidynathan, a former member of Kamal Haasan’s Makkal Needhi Maiam, has once again revealed the depths of her obsession with identity politics. In a bizarre and bigoted rant posted on X, she claimed that the opposition to stray dogs in Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) comes primarily from “upper caste, mostly Brahmin boomers.”
Yes, you read that right. In her worldview, complaints about stray dogs have nothing to do with public safety, sanitation, or the genuine fears of parents whose children have been bitten. No, according to her, it’s a grand Brahmin-Bania conspiracy against the oppressed and even against animals.
She wrote, “This is my understanding. Most of the RWA (Resident Welfare Associations) and gated community uncles and aunties shouting against street dogs are from the boomer generation and mostly Upper Caste, most of them Brahmins. They are retired or about to retire, jobless, so they get active on resident welfare WhatsApp groups and want to create some problem or the other. The India they grew up in, old-world, post-colonial streets, going to either Brahmin run schools or convent schools, streets mostly sheltered and homogenous, their friends from similar backgrounds, playing gully cricket, rarely meeting a person from an oppressed caste, is no longer the India that we know today. Oppressed people have educated themselves and become a formidable force in society. These boomer uncles and aunties cannot digest this change. They are not able to rule over the world, their nexuses are disappearing. Yet, the judiciary has a lot of them in very high positions and influence everything, creating laws that benefit only their own. Stray dogs, are, according to these boomers, part of a world they do not have to deal with. Some of them even feed curd rice for their imported Labradors and apply sacred ash on their “cute” husky’s forehead for Ganesh Chathurthi, but do not want to acknowledge the street dog. The Brahmin-Bania (read: OBC) nexus that rules India will always favour the social-capital-rich decisions and will always be against the interests of the marginalised, whether it be human or animal. In Tamilnadu, it is hence nothing surprising that the Brahmin-advised, Brahmin-adjudicated, OBC-run governments will join forces with the (otherwise hated) BJP at the centre in matters of dealing with the marginalised. End of day, in India, it matters not what you are, but who you are. And if you’re a street dog, god forbid, your life will be a living hell simply because you don’t matter in the least to people who still make their domestic help get into their houses through a separate entrance.”
This is my understanding.
Most of the RWA (Resident Welfare Associations) and gated community uncles and aunties shouting against street dogs are from the boomer generation and mostly Upper Caste, most of them Brahmins. They are retired or about to retire, jobless, so they get…
— Vinodhini Vaidynathan (@VinodhiniUnoffl) September 13, 2025
From Debate to Demagoguery: The Anatomy of Hate
Her argument is not just flawed; it reeks of prejudice.
India has seen an alarming rise in dog-bite cases. Children mauled to death, elderly people attacked, daily wage workers injured, these are not upper-caste inventions. They are hard realities documented across states. RWAs raising concerns about stray dog menace are fulfilling a civic responsibility, not indulging in “caste supremacist nostalgia.” To reduce this serious issue to caste hatred is not just foolish, it is dangerous.
Vinodhini goes further, stereotyping entire communities as curd-rice-feeding, husky-worshipping hypocrites who secretly control the judiciary and the government. This isn’t social critique. This is textbook hate speech targeting Brahmins, something she knows will get her applause from a certain echo chamber online. By painting them as villains even in matters of stray dogs, she exposes her inability to engage with reality outside her caste obsession.
She paints an entire generation and community as “jobless,” with nothing better to do than create problems on WhatsApp groups. This is not criticism; it is a lazy, ageist, and casteist caricature designed to dehumanize rather than engage. Since when did concern for one’s family’s safety become a sinister plot born of idleness?
She romanticizes a supposedly homogenous, caste-pure past for this community, which she claims is threatened by the education and rise of “oppressed people.” This is not just factually incorrect but dangerously divisive. It manufactures a majoritarian victimhood for a community she simultaneously accuses of ruling the judiciary and creating self-serving laws. The cognitive dissonance is staggering.
The pièce de résistance of her rant is the claim of a “Brahmin-Bania nexus that rules India.” This sentence alone exposes the intellectual bankruptcy of the argument. It is a convenient boogeyman, a catch-all conspiracy where any government action she dislikes can be blamed on this shadowy, ill-defined cabal.
The most grotesque part of her post is the performative concern for street dogs, which is immediately undermined by her own hatred. She attacks people for applying sacred ash on their pets while, in the same breath, applying the digital equivalent of a caste mark on an entire section of society to mark them for abuse. She claims to speak for the “marginalized,” yet her language is dripping with the very same majoritarian prejudice she pretends to oppose.
Vinodhini Vaidynathan’s post is not just crass, it is deeply irresponsible. By dragging Brahmins, OBCs, and even the BJP into something as straightforward as RWAs dealing with stray dogs, she has displayed the intellectual bankruptcy of identity politics. This is social poison.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
