A shocking turn has emerged in Congress’s “Vote Chori” allegations against the Election Commission of India colluding with the BJP. The latest developments suggest that the party, which accused the Election Commission (ECI) of orchestrating the largest electoral theft may have inadvertently unearthed embarrassing truths about itself and its own leaders since independence. This current issue spans multiple constituencies: in Wayanad (Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Vadra), Rae Bareli (Rahul Gandhi), Diamond Harbour (Abhishek Banerjee), Kolathur (M.K. Stalin), and Kannauj/Mainpuri (Akhilesh Yadav, Dimple Yadav).
Historically, Congress has repeatedly been implicated in manipulating election outcomes:
- 1952: Allegedly engineered Dr. Ambedkar’s electoral defeat alongside Communist support.
- 1957: Accused of orchestrating a booth takeover in Begusarai.
- 1967: Won 61 seats in Jammu & Kashmir via uncontested wins and disqualifying rival nominations.
- 1975: Indira Gandhi’s 1971 Rae Bareli victory was overturned due to confirmed electoral fraud—Justice Sinha found her guilty on two counts.
- 1987: Congress and the National Conference were accused of rigging the elections in Kashmir.
The Nehru–Gandhi family has frequently turned against institutions and voters when electoral outcomes didn’t favor them:
- After losing in 1977, Indira Gandhi called the electorate “a bunch of fools.”
- Following the 1989 defeat, Rajiv Gandhi blamed the faulty ballot papers.
Rahul Gandhi appears to be following the same playbook: launching unsubstantiated claims to deflect defeat, refusing to back them with evidence or formal declarations, failing to file official complaints despite EC invitations, and undermining democracy with misinformation. For instance, neither the INC nor the RJD lodged any official protest with the Election Commission in Bihar.
Despite repeated invitations from the Election Commission to discuss concerns regarding the voter roll, Rahul Gandhi failed to appear. No formal evidence has been submitted by Congress, nor has any candidate filed an electoral petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act to challenge the results.
Several of his claims have been contradicted by available data:
- New Voter Additions in Maharashtra: Historical trends show high voter increases in both 2004 (4.7%) and 2009 (4.1%), which favored the UPA, while the 2024 increase was actually lower (4.4%).
- Late Evening Voting Surge: Alleged post-5 PM surges are not supported by data before 5 PM averaged 58 lakh/hr, while after 5 PM dropped to 32.5 lakh/hr. All INC booth agents signed Form 17C without dispute, and no election petitions were filed.
- Karnataka Voter Roll: Contradicted by Congress’s own state minister, K.N. Rajanna, who reminded that the voter list was prepared under a Congress-run government—pointing to inconsistency in Rahul Gandhi’s claims.
Rahul also criticized the BJP’s win but remained silent about the Congress’s 2024 Lok Sabha performance in Dhule, Maharashtra:
- BJP secured about 5.75 lakh votes across 5 of 6 assembly seats, while INC managed 3.84 lakh.
- BJP led by 1.9 lakh votes in those seats.
- In Malegaon Central, largely supported by minorities, INC won by a massive margin of 1,94,327 votes (94.52%), with BJP only at 4,542 votes (2.21%).
So why this huge drama around “Vote Chori”? Many believe it is a tactic to divert attention from the more pressing issue: the “ghuspaithiya vote bank” a term coined to describe alleged opposition strategies that involve appeasement politics, engineered infiltrations, and the protection of illegal voters.
Key methods allegedly used in this strategy include:
- Duplicate Voters – Same people registered across multiple polling booths (e.g., Mohd Kaif Khan in Rae Bareli).
- Fake Addresses – Multiple voter IDs tied to a single address (e.g., House No. n0011 in Diamond Harbour or House No. 189 in Rae Bareli).
- Fake Relatives – Shifting identity of relatives across years (e.g., Khurshid Alam’s father’s name changing across voter rolls in Diamond Harbour).
- Manipulated Ages – Extremely elderly new voters registering for the first time (e.g., voters aged 102, 101, and 99 in Wayanad’s Nilambur).
- Mass Voter Additions – Booths with spiking voter numbers over a short period (in Diamond Harbour, 301 of 1,724 booths saw over 15% growth in four years; TMC strongholds saw gains in the range of 32–92%).
It appears that whenever Congress shouts “Vote Theft,” they are essentially describing their own strategy. The opposition is relying on the “Ghuspaithiya” (infiltrator) vote bank to ensure their political survival. This involves compromising national security and usurping the legitimate mandate of genuine Indian citizens. A detailed analysis of six constituencies governed by the opposition has uncovered this Ghuspaithiya Vote Bank, specifically in Wayanad (Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Vadra), Raebareli (Rahul Gandhi), Diamond Harbour (Abhishek Banerjee), Kolathur (MK Stalin), Kannauj (Akhilesh Yadav), and Mainpuri (Dimple Yadav).
A Deep Dive into 6 Opposition Strongholds Reveals the Scale:
WAYANAD – 93,499 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
20,438 Duplicate Voters: For example, Maimoona appears multiple times in different booths within the Eranad Assembly:
- Booth #135: EPIC ZGR0553818
- Booth #115: EPIC ZGR6629158
- Booth #152: EPIC ZGR6716849
17,450 Voters with Fake Addresses: There are 52 voter IDs registered at House No: o/ Kotangodaan, booth 52, Wandoor Assembly.
4,246 Voters from Mixed Households: Voters belonging to multiple religions are registered in the same households such as:
- House No: Vallikattummal, booth 24, Thiruvambady Assembly
- House No: o/Chaunderi, booth 41, Kalpetta Assembly
51,365 Voters Added via Mass Addition: Instances of very elderly voters recently added include:
- Lillikutty, age 102, booth 25, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA0705657)
- Kamalamma, age 101, booth 90, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA0842245)
- Paru, age 101, booth 97, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA1915214)
- Annamma, age 99, booth 56, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA0829457)
- Thresiamma, age 99, booth 56, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA0834085)
- Khadeeja, age 99, booth 46, Nilambur (EPIC: NIA2139558)
Following his defeat in Uttar Pradesh, Rahul Gandhi shifted focus to Kerala, aiming to win by depending on votes from a single community. The voter rolls there are plagued with irregularities such as duplicate registrations at identical addresses and bulk entries from one community. Both UDF and LDF have contributed to Islamic radicalization in Kerala. Now, as BJP challenges them, they accuse BJP of voter fraud in response to their losses. Will Priyanka Gandhi step down after allegations of “Vote Chori” (vote theft) in Wayanad?
RAE BARELI – 200,089 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
19,512 Duplicate Voters: For example, Mohd Kaif Khan appears in multiple booths in Rae Bareli Assembly:
- Booth #83: EPIC YDG3034774
- Booth #151: EPIC YDG3160587
- Booth #218: EPIC YDG3015831
71,977 Voters with Fake Addresses: Examples include:
- 47 voter IDs at House No 189, booth 131, Rae Bareli Assembly
- 31 voter IDs at House No 86, booth 32, Harchandpur Assembly
15,853 Voters with Mixed Households: Multiple religions registered at:
- House No 7, booth 292, Harchandpur Assembly
- House No 4, booth 232, Sareni Assembly
92,747 Voters via Mass Addition: Newly added elderly voters include:
- Saidun, age 89 (EPIC: YDG3091097)
- Abdul Haq, age 85 (EPIC: YDG3044724)
- Saddam, age 91 (EPIC: YDG3000288)
- Mohd Yaqub, age 92 (EPIC: YDG2735611)
- Hasmatun, age 85 (EPIC: YDG2700995)
The hidden reality behind the Gandhi stronghold reveals strange anomalies in the voter lists: multiple people registered at one house and many with nonexistent addresses. Investigations uncovered over 52,000 fake birth certificates linked to bogus locations. Evidence indicates these fake identities were fabricated to build a loyal voter base for the future. Rae Bareli’s consistent wins may not be solely due to trust or charisma but possibly aided by manipulation of the voter base. This story reflects less about political legacy and more about how power, when held too tightly, can distort the system.
Will Rahul Gandhi resign following accusations of “Vote Chori” in Rae Bareli?
DIAMOND HARBOUR – 259,779 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
3,613 Duplicate Voters: Examples include:
- Zakir Hussain Molla, Bishnupur Assembly
- Subid Ali Molla, Bishnupur Assembly
- Shabana Khatun, Bishnupur Assembly
155,365 Voters with Fake Addresses: Examples include:
- 28 voter IDs at House No n001, booth 265, Diamond Harbour Assembly
- 111 voter IDs at House No n0097, booth 66, Falta Assembly
290 Voters with Fake Relatives: Khurshid Alam’s father’s name changed over the years in Diamond Harbour rolls. Abdul Majeed (unknown year) → Tojdel Laskar (2024), EPIC: FLL3178274. This tactic of using fake or “rented” parents is common for infiltrators to enter electoral rolls.
43,947 Voters from Mixed Households: People from different religions registered at:
- House No n0011, booth 103, Falta Assembly
- House No n0026, booth 248, Bishnupur Assembly
- House No N00, booth 225, Budge Budge Assembly
56,564 Voters via Mass Addition: Newly added elderly voters include:
- Sariman Bibi, age 89, Satgachia (EPIC: KKC0705079)
- Hamida Bibi, age 87, Bishnupur (EPIC: UBL2637437)
- Saleha Molla, age 94, Bishnupur (EPIC: UBL2543718)
- Ramjan Sekh, age 86, Bishnupur (EPIC: UBL2565828)
- Ajufa Molla, age 93, Bishnupur (EPIC: NYH1374933)
Out of 1,724 booths, 301 saw more than a 15% increase in voter strength in just 4 years. Constituencies like Bishnupur and Maheshtala have seen significant spikes in voter additions recently. West Bengal is on the brink of demographic invasion as the Left and TMC parties have promoted illegal immigration purely for political benefit. This demographic shift has caused irreversible damage to Bengal’s people and identity. The system has been exploited so deeply that West Bengal risks becoming “West Bangladesh.”
Will Abhishek Banerjee resign after charges of “Vote Chori” in Diamond Harbour?
KANNAUJ (Akhilesh Yadav) – 291,798 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
16,163 Duplicate Voters: Examples include:
- Akeel, son of Khaleel, Rasulabad Assembly (EPIC MVS4313300, WTM0065920)
- Raju, son of Mulla, Rasulabad Assembly (EPIC UP/64/299/0585500, UP/64/298/0678072)
153,919 Voters with Fake Addresses: For example, 79 voter IDs are registered in House No 244, booth 185 of Kannauj Assembly.
25,772 Voters from Mixed Households: Voters from multiple religions registered in:
- House No 187, booth 150, Chhibramau Assembly
- House No 7, booth 484, Chhibramau Assembly
74,531 Voters via Mass Addition: Newly added elderly voters include:
- Rozi Begam, age 120, Rasulabad (EPIC: AAX2103737)
- Mufeed, age 107, Kannauj (EPIC: ATO3495983)
Will Akhilesh Yadav resign following accusations of “Vote Chori” in Kannauj?
MAINPURI (Dimple Yadav) – 255,914 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
176,078 Voters with Fake Addresses: Examples include:
- 65 voter IDs at House No 82, booth 330, Jaswant Nagar Assembly
- 37 voter IDs at House No 38, booth 228, Bhongaon Assembly
16,216 Voters from Mixed Households: Multiple religions registered in:
- House No 135, booth 58, Karhal Assembly
- House No 1, booth 142, Karhal Assembly
49,532 Voters via Mass Addition: Newly added elderly voters include:
- Sabri Begum, age 78, Jaswant Nagar (EPIC: XFH4899035)
- Hameedan Begum, age 78, Jaswant Nagar (EPIC: XFH4918678)
- Shah Mohammad, age 81, Kishni Assembly (EPIC: NDA2649804)
- Mohd. Shahbaz, age 79, Bhongaon Assembly (EPIC: ZTI2920361)
- Noor Mohammad Rehmani, age 83, Bhongaon (EPIC: ZTI3005394)
- Nisaar Bano, age 84, Bhongaon (EPIC: ZTI2771459)
Will Dimple Yadav resign after allegations of “Vote Chori” in Mainpuri?
KOLATHUR (MK Stalin) – 19,476 QUESTIONABLE VOTERS
9,133 Voters with Fake Addresses: 30 voter IDs registered at House No 11, booth 84, Kolathur Assembly.
4,379 Duplicate Voters: RAFI ULLAH appears three times with different EPIC numbers in booth 157 of Kolathur.
5,964 Voters from Mixed Households: Multiple religions registered in:
- House No 10, booth 140, Kolathur (80 voter IDs)
- House No 20, booth 187, Kolathur (62 voter IDs)
Will MK Stalin resign after accusations of “Vote Chori” in Kolathur?
Why Is Rahul Gandhi Targeting SIR?
The Congress narrative attacks SIR (Special Intensive Revision), a standard Election Commission procedure meant to clean voter rolls by eliminating: Duplicates, Ghost entries, Fake IDs. SIR isn’t new it was accepted during similar exercises in Bengal (2002) and Bihar (2003) without resistance. Today, it’s seen as a threat because it jeopardizes the vote bank politics built over years. By targeting SIR, Rahul Gandhi and others are seen as trying to shield these engineered voter blocks.
In reality, SIR represents an essential effort to restore electoral credibility. So, if the opposition cries “Vote Theft,” perhaps they’re just revealing their own political blueprint.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
