In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves across political circles, Congress strategist and longtime Rahul Gandhi aide Yogendra Yadav (known as Salim to his friends) inadvertently exposed the real intentions behind the party’s infamous “vote chori” campaign.

During an interview with Arfa Khanum Sherwani on The Wire, released on 20 September 2025, Yadav admitted that the Congress-led campaign against the Election Commission and the BJP was never about evidence, affidavits, or legal recourse. Instead, he candidly revealed that the exercise was purely a psychological maneuver aimed at manipulating public perception and sowing doubt in the minds of Indian voters about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the electoral system.

Yogendra Yadav accidently exposed the real toolkit behind the Rahul Gandhi’s Vote Chori campaign

He told that campaign is not about going to Court and Prove facts. Its a psychological game

He said that agenda behind this campaign is to manipulate perception of Indians and to… pic.twitter.com/QM1TdkTo9F

— The Chronology (@TheChronology__) September 20, 2025

A Campaign Designed to Undermine Democracy

Yadav made it clear that submitting affidavits or going to court is “meaningless” because the purpose was not to prove facts but to influence public sentiment. He acknowledged that Rahul Gandhi’s persistent narrative had already shaped perception, even causing doubt among BJP supporters themselves. “Public perception is syncing with this, and to that extent, Rahul Gandhi has succeeded so far,” Yadav stated, confirming what political analysts have long suspected: the campaign was a strategic ploy to destabilize trust in India’s democratic institutions rather than a legitimate complaint.

This admission lays bare the Congress party’s modus operandi of leveraging the Election Commission, media channels, and orchestrated public rallies not to correct electoral errors but to deliberately tarnish reputations and create a climate of distrust. Yadav even claimed that anti-BJP and neutral voters were beginning to view the ruling party with skepticism, a direct objective of the campaign.

The Party Scrambles to Contain the Fallout

The fallout from Yadav’s candid disclosure has reportedly left the Congress high command furious. After this video became viral, Yadav launched a series of justifications and defensive statements on X to cover up the blunder, claiming misinterpretation and stressing “public discourse” rather than admitting to the strategic manipulation.

According to sources

Congress high command is furious with Yogendra Yadav for recklessly exposing the plan.

Now, YoYa is scrambling with repeated justifications to cover up his blunder. https://t.co/7DyCPTAWqN pic.twitter.com/qm2tdE3uJI

— The Chronology (@TheChronology__) September 22, 2025

Analysts note that these reactive measures are unlikely to undo the damage, as Yadav essentially confirmed that the party has been using fabricated or unverified data to weaken democratic institutions.

Historical Context: Rahul Gandhi’s Agenda

This revelation is consistent with Rahul Gandhi’s infamous 2019 interview with India Today, where he openly stated, “I am going to rip that strength to pieces. I am going to take it and shred it,” referring to PM Modi’s credibility. The Congress party has continued in this vein, orchestrating campaigns, press conferences, and political rallies aimed at undermining the BJP and its governance without providing evidence to support their claims.

The “vote chori” campaign, with its relentless focus on alleged voter fraud, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive in Bihar, and charges of voter disenfranchisement, is merely an extension of this strategy. Despite repeated requests from the Election Commission, neither Rahul Gandhi nor his allies, including Yadav, have submitted affidavits or proof, reinforcing the fact that perception management, not truth, drives the campaign.

By openly admitting that the campaign’s primary goal is to manipulate perception, Yadav has inadvertently revealed the Congress’ willingness to compromise democratic institutions for political gain.

Yogendra Yadav’s unguarded statements have pulled back the curtain on the Congress party’s “vote chori” campaign, exposing it as a calculated attempt to undermine trust in India’s democratic processes rather than a genuine concern about electoral fairness. In the wake of his accidental confession, the party is scrambling to control the narrative through social media defenses and public justifications, but the damage is already done. This only proves that the Congress’ strategy is no longer just political opposition but an orchestrated attempt to destabilize democracy, create anarchy, through manipulation and fear.

(With inputs from OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post Rahul Gandhi’s Aide Spills The Beans About Congress’ Sinister Plan Of Anarchy, Goes On Tweet Rant To Cover Up Blunder appeared first on The Commune.

In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, where innocent lives were lost in a gruesome assault that shook the nation, alleged psephologist Yogendra Yadav—once again—took to X not to condemn the terrorists or demand justice, but to lecture Indians on what not to do. His post, masquerading as a message of peace, was in reality a masterclass in moral grandstanding, tone-deaf deflection, and insidious whitewashing of terror.

While India mourned, Yadav sermonized. His message to the nation? Don’t blame anyone. Don’t demand accountability. Don’t see the terrorists’ ideology. Don’t even name the religion of the attackers—because, according to him, that would make us like them. In a country still grappling with the brutal pain of lives lost to jihadist violence, Yadav’s response read less like a call for unity and more like a PR exercise for the perpetrators.

On his X handle, he wrote, “In this hour of national mourning, it should be the duty of every Indian to avoid the four reactions that the Pahalgam terrorists would have wanted from us: 1. Don’t blame. This is the time to stand with the grieving families, not for blame games and media trials. 2. Do not put pressure on the government to take immediate retaliatory action. Give the military, security agencies and diplomats the opportunity to respond in a timely manner and in their own way. 3. Do not consider the people of Kashmir to be involved in the brutality of foreign terrorists. They are also victims of this incident. Thousands of families have lost their jobs. They need our help, our love. 4. Do not identify a person by his religion. This is what the terrorists did, assuming that we will all imitate them. Taking a pledge of Hindu Muslim unity is the most effective answer to the terrorists. Jai Hind!”

Yogendra Yadav – The Saint Of Selective Outrage

Yadav’s four-point prescription for national mourning reveals his true colors. First, he implores Indians not to “blame,” a clever euphemism for discouraging any serious examination of the jihadist ideology behind the attack. This from a man who has never hesitated to blame the Indian state, majority community, or Prime Minister Modi for every real and imagined grievance.

Second, he cautions against pressuring the government for retaliation, a curious demand coming from someone whose entire career has been built on pressuring governments through protests often bordering on violent unrest. The irony is palpable—when Yadav’s ideological fellow travelers riot in the streets, it’s “democratic dissent”; when Hindus demand action against terrorists, it’s “jingoism.”

Third, his plea to not associate ordinary Kashmiris with terrorism deliberately conflates the valley’s innocent civilians with its entrenched ecosystem of terror sympathizers. No serious counterterrorism strategy can afford this false equivalence, yet Yadav pushes it relentlessly.

Finally, his admonition against identifying attackers by their religion would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous. The terrorists didn’t shoot pilgrims at random—they targeted Hindus specifically. Yet Yadav, who has built his career on identity politics, suddenly discovers the virtues of colorblindness when Islamic extremists are the perpetrators.

Yogendra Yadav’s History Of Siding With Anti-India Forces

This is not an isolated episode. Yogendra Yadav’s record is littered with instances where he has aligned himself with radical and anti-India elements. In 2020, his name appeared in the Delhi Police chargesheet on the anti-CAA riots, where he was identified as a co-conspirator. He allegedly attended a meeting alongside Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam where plans to instigate violent protests were laid out. According to the police, this meeting was the genesis of the DPSG WhatsApp group, which coordinated the violent outbreaks during President Trump’s visit.

And yet, in media circles, Yadav continues to masquerade as a scholar, a peace-monger, a “man of the people.” His association with the Sambhaavnaa Institute—funded by Internews, a USAID-backed organization accused of pushing foreign narratives in India—further reveals how deep his ties are with global networks that aim to destabilize India through soft power and social manipulation.

The Dangerous Cost Of Moral Cowardice

Yogendra Yadav represents a section of India’s intelligentsia that refuses to acknowledge the ideological roots of jihadist violence. By constantly shifting the burden of morality onto victims and shielding the attackers behind flowery platitudes, Yadav and his ilk are enabling a culture where terrorism is depoliticized, deradicalized, and ultimately normalized.

India deserves better. The victims of terror deserve justice, not lectures. And the country deserves commentators who call out the truth, not career activists who twist tragedy into an opportunity for ideological posturing.

Yadav’s words are not calls for peace—they’re camouflage for terror.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post “Do Not Identify Person By Religion”: Rahul Gandhi’s Aide Yogendra Yadav’s Sanctimonious Sermon After Pahalgam Terror Attack Is Nothing But An Attempt To Whitewash Islamic Terrorists appeared first on The Commune.

The 7 point action plan that presents guidelines to respond to the crisis created by the pandemic, put forth and endorsed by a group of politicians, economists, historians, and activists, is being called out for its utopian vision and problematic suggestions. One of the clauses that have raised serious concerns is clause 7.1 which states that all private property, which includes bonds, gold, property etc ‘must be treated as a national resource’.

This clause has been flagged for its totalitarian and socialist nature that seeks to deprive citizens of the right to hold property. After receiving flak for the same, historian Ramchandra Guha took a u-turn and distanced himself from the clause saying that he did not endorse it.

He took to twitter to declare that the clause presented to him during the discussion was radically different from the one published.

The published version had a radically different clause 7.1:
“All the resources (cash, real estate, property, bonds, etc) with the citizens or within the nation must be treated as national resources available during this crisis.”
I have not and do not endorse this.
(2/3)

— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) May 23, 2020

Mr. Guha said that when the clause was discussed it read as “All resources within the nation are national resources, available for this mission”.

He added that the said clause had become “deeply  tendentious with the major changes made without the consent of some signatories” noting that it had taken away attention from many ‘sensible’ suggestions.

This tweet thread has however been deleted.

Mr. Guha once again came out with a tweet with the rephrased clause put by Yogendra Yadav that says “the government must explore emergency ways of raising resources going beyond the usual set of taxes and levies to cope with the problem of funding large relief packages”, which effectively means the same. He said that new clause 7.1 was extremely appropriate.

The post Ram Guha does multiple U-Turns: Advocates 7 point action plan, distances himself from ‘private property clause’, endorses new clause that effectively means the same appeared first on The Commune.