In the aftermath of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination on 10 September 2025, at a rally held at Utah Valley University, a disturbing wave of reactions has emerged on social media. While political leaders from across the spectrum have roundly denounced the attack, a number of accounts associated with left-leaning ideologies have shared posts that appear to mock or even celebrate his death provoking widespread backlash and raising concerns about the normalization of political violence online.

What Happened To Charlie Kirk?

Charlie Kirk, aged 31, was the founder of Turning Point USA and a key conservative voice aligned with former President Donald Trump. He was shot and killed while addressing supporters at an event in Orem, Utah a killing widely described as a politically motivated assassination.

Kirk was known for his outspoken conservative beliefs and efforts to engage young voters. He leaves behind his wife, Erika, and their two children. In the wake of his death, prominent political figures including Trump, President Joe Biden, and former President Barack Obama issued strong statements condemning the act and calling for unity in the face of rising political extremism.

Despite this bipartisan condemnation, reactions on social media platform have been deeply polarized. A portion of left-leaning users on various platforms have circulated posts that mock or justify Kirk’s killing. These responses have drawn sharp criticism for their tone and perceived insensitivity.

Reactions On Social Media

One post by an X user, who responded to a resurfaced 2023 tweet by Kirk about casualties in Gaza, wrote, “btw, according to Charlie Kirk’s logic, his death is his own fault, not the shooter’s.”

This was accompanied by a screenshot of Kirk’s original post, in which he attributed the deaths of civilians in Gaza to Hamas rather than Israel drawing a comparison to Japan’s role in WWII. He stated, “The deaths of women and children in Gaza are the fault of Hamas, not Israel, just like the deaths in Japan during World War 2 were the fault of Japan, not America. When a government engages in unprovoked, murderous aggression, they are to blame for everything that results.”

btw, according to Charlie Kirk's logic, his death is his own fault, not the shooter's. pic.twitter.com/RraXXtK6v9

— Hassan Mafi ‏ (@thatdayin1992) September 10, 2025

Another user stated, “Hitler could get shot dead in this generation and mfs would still be like he had a family.” This was in response to a post who condemned the assassination, which said, “Charlie Kirk is a father and a husband. He is a human. I don’t care if you politically disagree with him nothing justifies this sick act.”

Hitler could get shot dead in this generation and mfs would still be like "he had a family" https://t.co/sbSYfPxt87

— vids that go hard (@vidsthatgohard) September 10, 2025

MSNBC Guest: "We don't know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or..?"

Are you serious???

MSNBC is an ABSOLUTE JOKE. pic.twitter.com/Y4lSTjU7Qc

— Jeffery Mead (@the_jefferymead) September 10, 2025

Another user believed to be teacher at Goose Creek School District in Texas suggests Charlie Kirk deserved to get shot and it was “karma”

Teacher at Goose Creek School District in Texas suggests Charlie Kirk deserved to get shot and it was “karma”

These are the people teaching your kids pic.twitter.com/2oyBicZ3sN

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 11, 2025

Kirk’s death and the subsequent reactions have deepened concerns over the state of political discourse in the U.S. While the inflammatory posts represent only a fraction of voices on the left, they have drawn widespread attention and condemnation, especially from Kirk’s supporters and conservative commentators.

Experts such as Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats have warned of a growing acceptance of political violence across ideologies. These reactions seem to support that view, with some users treating the assassination not as a tragedy, but as political score-settling.

Here are some more reactions:

Leftists in US are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Liberals all over the world are same. pic.twitter.com/YytHqyAWUQ

— Incognito (@Incognito_qfs) September 11, 2025

Liberals are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death

“Live by the sword, die by the sword. He did say that gun deaths were an acceptable side effect of gun rights.”

The deranged creepy laugh at the end while smiling makes me absolutely furious. The rage I feel…. Enough is enough. pic.twitter.com/QLXiXQVoCr

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) September 10, 2025

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post Woke Rabid Liberals And Leftists Celebrate And Rejoice Charlie Kirk’s Assassination appeared first on The Commune.

Continued from Part 1

The Islamist-Left-Liberal-Woke ideological collaboration deep at work in the developed, democratic, liberal, secular nations of the West and secular nations of the East like India, operates under the disguise of perceived victimhood, religious rights, human rights, equality, labour rights, feminism Etc.

Islamists joining the bandwagon of Left-Liberal causes, ensure the Muslim world’s clever strategy of equating Islam to the victimhood narrative and unfairly takes away the world’s attention from the real victims of deprivation, discrimination, suffering, and neglect.

This dangerous network has taken away the credibility of local, grass-roots organisations that sincerely try to address genuine issues without an ulterior motive or a religious/political agenda. Beware!

For a few years now, independent thinkers and think tanks in the U.S. and U.K. have been warning of the effects of the Islamist-Left-Woke-Liberal collaboration on the psyche of the average American citizen and public institutions run under government patronage. What they warned about most in recent times, is a heavy infusion of a fabricated, falsely implicated Islamic victimhood narrative cleverly played into the other “humanitarian” issues frequently raised by the ultra-Left – gender equality, racial issues, labour rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, environmental issues, etc.

In the distant past, the Leftist lobby had championed such common issues that appealed to most Western and Eastern people living in democracies. What is worrisome now, is the influence of the disguised, subtle but firm, and strong undertones of an Islamist agenda in the Left’s causes of interest. For example, in the U.S., U.K., Canada. Islamic organisations claiming injustice and victimhood disguise themselves as alternative human-rights organisations and join the same causes as the Left-Liberal-Feminist-Woke lobby.

Over a period of time, strong Muslim voices slowly take over the Left-Woke leadership roles in the Leftist organisations, and before the general public realises, the reputable organisations they had trusted in the past, are infiltrated by several Muslims in important positions peddling a Muslim victimhood/Muslim rights agenda along with the common themes of generic human rights, racial justice, equality, environmental rights, employment rights, etc.

In the process of growing membership and positions of leadership within the world’s Leftist organisations, the Muslims are helped by generous financial contributions by Muslim organisations in the host country funded by Islamic nations like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan.

So, how does this ultimately come back to haunt a nation like India? Islamists in foreign nations hiding in the rank and file of Leftist, socialist, secularists “democratic” organisations, begin to unnecessarily bring focus on issues like Kashmir, the CAA, and Minority rights in India when in reality, such issues have nothing to do with the common man’s problems in the U.S., U.K., or Canada!!

Equating the racial rights of the Black people in America’s shameful history of slavery with India’s caste, class, and religious rights in modern-day India, is a clever, convoluted argument of trying to equate racial rights in the ex-Slave colonies like the U.S. to religious and class rights in modern-day, post-independent India. It is NOT an equal comparison yet the Left-Liberal-Woke-Islamist network has successfully spun a bizarre story linking the two, non-similar, non-convergent stories set in two very different parts of the globe.

The current mental makeup and ideology of the Democratic Party in the U.S. is similar to that of India’s Congress Party. India has always been offered better deals in an open transactional environment when the Republican Party has been in power. Democratic leaders like Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden pay mere lip service to the ideals of democracy, they are good with their sweet-talking, friendly smiles, diplomatic gestures, and speeches but continue with their soft diplomacy, financial and military support to fascist and/or military ruled non-democratic nations and terror-sponsoring nations like Pakistan. It is the U.S.’s Republican leaders like Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Donald Trump that talk openly and frankly, drive hard bargains and strike tough yet fair deals and enable big business and military partnerships for India!

Similarly, in the U.K., the Labour Party’s agenda is ultra Leftist, pro-Islamist, and anti-India. The conservative Tory party is tougher on the Islamist narrative and while the Tories may not outrightly support India’s needs, they’re better at getting mutually beneficial business deals signed and handling sensitive matters with more care.

Left-leaning parties in most parts of the world have been taken over by a deadly, rabid mix of human rights with Islamic rights by supporting the false Muslim victimhood narrative which is ridiculous and an open lie, considering the aggression of Islam towards all other religions and the undeniable continuance of major human-rights, religious rights, women’s rights, children’s rights and labour rights abuse in Islamic countries. It is logical (in most cases, proven) to assume that Left-leaning governments and Leftist organisations enjoy ample financial support from Islamist groups and States and hence take a soft approach to the dangers of Islamic expansionist views. Such nations and organisations are likely to support an anti-India agenda.

Muslim appeasement (to a lesser degree, Christian appeasement) and extension of special privileges to one community against the principles of equal treatment for all, enshrined in the Constitution of democratic, practicing secular countries like the U.S, India, U.K, Canada, and others, has become a major worry for the Centre and Right-Of-Centre.

(Shivani is a freelance writer based in Vijayawada)

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post Unveiling The Complex Nexus: The Intersection Of Islamist-Left-Liberal-Woke Ideological Collaboration – Part 2 appeared first on The Commune.

The social, political, and economic ‘Centre’ and ‘Right of Centre’ segment of the world’s population is slowly waking up to the reality of a new, unholy, dangerous nexus among the ultra-Left, Liberal, Woke, and the ultra Islamist groups, in furthering a sinister agenda in most developed nations and a few developing countries like India.

Their ideological and political targets are the liberal, secular, and humanitarian-based developed nations in the West and those nations in the developing East, that are striving to emulate the West in their democratic, secular, liberal, human (rather than religion-centric) ideals. The Left-Liberal-Woke-Islamist network does not dare to operate in totalitarian, communist nations like Russia and China and Islamic nations and devoutly Christian nations. Their target is liberal, humanist, progressive “secular” nations.

They are too cowardly to try preaching supposedly “humanitarian” values to religious-extremist, non-secular nations or Islamic countries. This motley group targets those nations and citizens that are liberal enough to naively allow them to access their debate rooms, government offices, courtrooms, educational institutions, and their people’s minds.

In India, there has always been a tacit understanding (aiming to influence the public) among the “communist” Left, the Liberal Left, the urban and rural Naxalite Left, the Pseudo-secular Left, the peculiar Hindu-apologist Left, and the Islamists. In countries like the U.S and the U.K, the well-intentioned albeit unsuspecting public is bombarded with propaganda that tries to bring a loosely put-together concoction of class, gender, race, and religion (mostly Islam) together in the name of an “injustice” to all who fall in any of the four above-mentioned “victim” groups, which make it a sizeable, cohesive group to deal with.

The Right and Centre of Right are justified in worrying about this disturbing trend. Islamists market and promote themselves as victims of injustice in the world although they are the aggressors and perpetrators of inequality and injustice in most parts of the world!! By grabbing and effectively using the false “victimhood” narrative for itself, Islam has ensured that the real victims (non-Muslims, women, children, local cultures, indigenous tribes, etc.) are denied the real victimhood label and denied the assurance of necessary protection from Islam’s aggressive political and expansionist ambitions.

Any which way you look at it, both in the East and the West, the religion that has falsely grabbed and cornered the “victimhood” denominator and stands to gain the most from tying itself to all the “other” real vulnerable/ potential victimhood groups, carefully teaming up with them and cleverly aligning with them on strategic issues (immigration, special rights, free services, additional government aid, propagation and promotion of a particular religion etc.) …. is Islam!

Typically, liberal, democratic, and secular societies are far more tolerant of diverse faiths, life choices, opinions, and new ideas. Naturally, such nations become the target of the extremist, ultra Left-Woke-Islamist movements. They spin an elaborate story of victimhood and oppression so cleverly that by the time they are done weaving together a tapestry of several narratives and interwoven plots, most liberal, broad-minded people are tricked into believing this sinister group’s version of right and wrong without judging the veracity of their claims, fact-checking or listening to any alternative views.

The targets and victims of the Islamist-Left-Liberal-Woke propaganda, often become guilt-tripped for not belonging to either of the four sub-groups of this unholy nexus. The average, educated, broad-minded, humanist citizen in the targeted democratic, secular, liberal nations, stops questioning the highly exaggerated victimhood narratives or downright lies that have been falsely peddled to them. Therein lies the danger of a large, liberal, gullible “educated” population, blindsided by a clever enemy preying on their naivety, their goodwill, their humanity, their willingness to listen and accept different opinions.

After being brain-washed into thinking that all religions and political/ social views are “equal”, the broad-minded, educated, well-meaning populations of many democratic nations, lose their ability to fact-check, their ability to question, their ability to think independently, ultimately disabling them from seeing through the thick fog of misinformation, exaggeration and lies. By the end of a slow but steady brain-washing process highlighted frequently with tales of exaggerated suffering, victimhood, hardship, torture, etc….the average educated, liberal mind develops a sense of misplaced guilt and becomes apologetic for who he/she is, for absolutely no fault of theirs. The average educated, liberal, warm, and welcoming mind is made to feel guilty about having had a normal life and the opportunity to experience success with their own hard work!

The Islamist-Left-Liberal-Woke ideological collaboration/network and its operations, slow-poisoning young minds, has far-reaching consequences for Western secular democracies as well as the liberal, democratic, secular countries in the East – countries like India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines. The most impacted are the democratic, non-dictatorship, non-totalitarian, non-Islamic States.

The Left-Woke-Islamist networks that operate in countries like the U.S. and U.K. influence public opinion in their respective countries, impact independent thinking in educational institutions and government think tanks and ultimately impact
policy-making and their government’s official stand on certain global matters. Hence, the West’s stand (official or not) and unsolicited interference on matters like Kashmir and India’s other security problems, which are solely India’s internal issues to be handled at its own discretion, within its rights as an independent, sovereign nation.

*To be continued in Part 2*

(Shivani is a freelance writer based in Vijayawada)

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post Unveiling The Complex Nexus: The Intersection Of Islamist-Left-Liberal-Woke Ideological Collaboration – Part 1 appeared first on The Commune.

If anti-Semitism is a variety of racism, it is a most peculiar variety, with many unique characteristics. In my view as a historian, it is so peculiar that it deserves to be placed in a quite different category. I would call it an intellectual disease, a disease of the mind, extremely infectious and massively destructive.

– Paul Johnson

Many Jews who were living in Germany and Austria during the rise of the Nazis did not realise the gravity of the threat and the impending systematic annihilation of the chosen people at an industrial scale. Many Jews in Germany thought it was just a period of unrest and it will pass as it generally did. However, today it seems quite possible that a similar situation could develop in the United States as violence against Jews by pro-Palestinian supporters increase.

For the Jews, anti-Semitism, and bigotry had become part of their lives for centuries and they were so used to it. For them as long as they were left unmolested, no matter what anyone said it did not matter.

Not many know or would like to discuss that when Jews were fleeing Germany and other parts of Europe, most saw the United States as their safest bet but visas were refused to tens of thousands on the grounds of national security. President Franklin Roosevelt himself argued that refugees posed a serious threat to national security. But one could argue that those were times of great confusion and uncertainty.

In a Gallup poll conducted in 1939, public opinion ran 2:1 against bringing 10,000 Jewish refugee children from Germany into the country.

US Jan 20 ’39: Should the US government permit 10,000 mostly Jewish refugee children to come in from Germany? pic.twitter.com/5cFs5RabQn

— Historical Opinion (@HistOpinion) November 17, 2015

The wife of the US immigration commissioner (who was a cousin of President Roosevelt) testified that “20,000 charming children would all too soon grow into 20,000 ugly adults”.

Antisemitism which ran deep in America also played an important role in the decision-making process of the politicians who then as they also do now valued public opinion. Catholic priest Charles Coughlin, known as “the radio priest,” who could be called the precursor of modern-day tele-evangelism started the first Catholic religious services over the radio that reached millions. Coughlin preached antisemitism in his speeches.

He used the age-old stereotype of accusing the Jews of manipulating financial institutions and conspiring to control the world which many Islamists to this day propagate. Also, automobile pioneer and father of the assembly line industrialist Henry Ford was antisemitic.

Aftermath of Israel-Palestine conflict

While there are perfectly legitimate criticisms that one can make of Israel or the actions of its government – and I have never been shy about making them – those criticisms cross the line into anti-Semitism when they ascribe evil, almost supernatural powers to Israel in a manner that replicates classic anti-Semitic slanders.

– Bari Weiss

The same environment of hate against the Jews is now being seen in the United States as many supporters of the left movement along with Muslim organisation and the Palestinians are going on a rampage across the US. Just as the Nazis attacked synagogues (Jewish Temple) in Germany, mobs have attacked synagogues across the US all due to the recent Israel-Palestine conflict.

I'm a complete mess in tears as I write this. I just got off the phone with my Rabbi our synagogue was vandalized someone through a rock at our glass door. This was NOT and accident! I feel numb. This is in #tucson Send prayers our way. It's just the beginning #Antisemitism pic.twitter.com/YFZCL3tgFM

— (((Rep.Alma Hernandez))) (@almaforarizona) May 19, 2021

Hamas which is a Sunni Islamists terrorist organisation launched several rockets over the civilian population in Israel. When Israel retaliated, many Palestinian civilians regrettably lost their lives but the fact remains that Hamas used them as a human shields.

The ensuing violence against Jews in the US has resulted in many Jews hiding their identity like prayer shawls and yarmulkes which many Jewish men wear on top of their heads. But now if any Jew in cities like New York is seen with Jewish identity, they are attacked with vengeance.

Sickening! In a blatant act of antisemitism, pro-Palestinian supporters vandalized a synagogue in Skokie, Illinois, with a "Free Palestine" sign and smashed several of the synagogue's windows. pic.twitter.com/emUKYiSBcD

— StandWithUs (@StandWithUs) May 20, 2021

The perpetrators are supported by a group of six Democratic Party members of the U.S. House of Representatives including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. They have since been joined by Jamaal Bowman of New York and Cori Bush of Missouri and are known as the most progressive and left-wing members of the Democratic party in the United States Congress.

The left and the Islamists in the US are also getting a lot of support from the social media influencers and entertainers who provide a platform of moral equivalency and supporting the talking points of Hamas, a terrorist organization that is hellbent on killing every last Jew in Palestine.

After the Biden administration came to power the disease of anti-Semitism has only spread wider. How can Muslims in America who live under the constitution be allowed to behave as if they are protected under the Sharia law which gives them the right to attack the Jews?

In Los Angels, pro-Palestinian demonstrators attacked Beverly Grove restaurant by singling out and attacking Jewish diners. The attackers were caught on camera and shouting “death to Jews” and “free Palestine.”

The Nuremberg Laws stripped Jews of their German citizenship and made them stateless in their own country and it seems if this continues, many Jews may be forced to consider their options.

What everyone is witnessing in America is quite similar to Kristallnacht or the Night of Broken Glass, also called the November Pogrom(s) against Jews carried out by the Nazi Party but in this case, the liberal left intellectuals are allowing Islamists to systematically target Jews.

This article was republished from Samvada World with permission. Read the original article here.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The post Left Liberalism and rabid Islamism provides a deadly combination for anti-Semitism in US appeared first on The Commune.